3 622

Cited 5 times in

The optimal morning: evening ratio in total dose of twice-daily biphasic insulin analogue in poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes: a 24-week multi-centre prospective, randomized controlled, open-labelled clinical study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이병완-
dc.contributor.author이용호-
dc.contributor.author차봉수-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T16:30:36Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-06T16:30:36Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0742-3071-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/98240-
dc.description.abstractAIMS: Biphasic insulin analogues are widely used in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus suboptimally controlled on oral anti-diabetic drugs. Several topics in this area remain controversial, including how to divide the daily dose of biphasic insulin analogue. We aimed to determine the optimal dosing ratio of twice-daily biphasic insulin analogue and to compare the glycaemic efficacy among groups of patients using different initial dosing ratios of biphasic insulin analogue. METHODS: A total of 100 poorly controlled insulin-naive subjects with Type 2 diabetes [HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol, (7.5%)] on oral anti-diabetic drugs were randomized into three groups according to initial morning:evening dosing ratio (group I, 50:50; group II, 55:45; group III, 60:40) of twice-daily biphasic insulin analogue (biphasic insulin aspart 70/30, biphasic insulin aspart 30). The primary outcome measure was the difference in pre-breakfast to pre-dinner dose ratio at the end of the study. RESULTS: Twice-daily biphasic insulin analogue showed a significant improvement in glycaemic control [HbA1c from 70 mmol/mol (8.6%) to 60 mmol/mol (7.6%)] after 24 weeks regardless of the initial dose ratio given. Despite the similar efficacy and safety profiles among three groups, morning dose was significantly increased (from 50:50 to 55:45-60:40) in group I after 24 weeks. However, there was no significant change in splitting ratio in groups II and III (with higher morning dose) over the 24-week treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that initiating twice-daily biphasic insulin analogue on regimens with a higher dose before breakfast than before dinner (i.e. ratio approximately 55:45 to 60:40) might be more appropriate in Korean subjects with Type 2 diabetes.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent68~75-
dc.relation.isPartOfDIABETIC MEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHBiphasic Insulins/administration & dosage*-
dc.subject.MESHBiphasic Insulins/pharmacokinetics-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Glucose/drug effects*-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Glucose/metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Glucose Self-Monitoring-
dc.subject.MESHDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHDose-Response Relationship, Drug-
dc.subject.MESHDrug Administration Schedule-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGlycated Hemoglobin A/drug effects*-
dc.subject.MESHGlycated Hemoglobin A/metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHHypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage*-
dc.subject.MESHHypoglycemic Agents/pharmacokinetics-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleThe optimal morning: evening ratio in total dose of twice-daily biphasic insulin analogue in poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes: a 24-week multi-centre prospective, randomized controlled, open-labelled clinical study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorC. H. Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ.-Y. Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ. H. Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorK.-H. Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorH. K. Yang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY.-H. Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorB. S. Cha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorB.-W. Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dme.12322-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02796-
dc.contributor.localIdA02989-
dc.contributor.localIdA03996-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00726-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5491-
dc.identifier.pmid24118113-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.12322/abstract-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Byung Wan-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Yong Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCha, Bong Soo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Byung Wan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Yong Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCha, Bong Soo-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage68-
dc.citation.endPage75-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationDIABETIC MEDICINE, Vol.31(1) : 68-75, 2014-
dc.identifier.rimsid50740-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.