3 278

Cited 0 times in

Is there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김무정-
dc.contributor.author김종원-
dc.contributor.author김지현-
dc.contributor.author노성훈-
dc.contributor.author박효진-
dc.contributor.author윤영훈-
dc.contributor.author이용찬-
dc.contributor.author최승호-
dc.contributor.author형우진-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T16:22:05Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-06T16:22:05Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1068-9265-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/97976-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The patients with early gastric cancer who have undergone incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) generally need additional surgery because of the possibility of lymph node metastasis. The aim of study was to evaluate the optimal time interval from ER to additive surgery by evaluating the effect of time interval on the surgical and oncological outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed 154 patients who underwent additive gastrectomy after incomplete ER at Severance and Gangnam Severance Hospitals. The time interval point, at which operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL) of the earlier operation group and the later operation group showed the greatest disparities, was evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time interval point, as the earlier operation group (group A) and the later operation group (group B). We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: The greatest difference between operative time and EBL was in the groups who underwent operation before and after 29 days. Of the 154 patients, 78 were in group A (≤29 days) and 76 in group B (>29 days). There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes except for tumor size. The operative time and EBL were significantly longer and more in group A compared with group B. CONCLUSIONS: The time interval between ER and additive surgery is associated with surgical outcomes. Additive surgery at about 1 month after ER may be optimal for better surgical outcomes without affecting the oncological outcomes.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent232~239-
dc.relation.isPartOfANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHEndoscopy, Digestive System*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHGastrectomy*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Node Excision-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm, Residual/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm, Residual/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHReoperation*-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.titleIs there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoo Jung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJie-Hyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Chan Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Won Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Ho Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Jin Hyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hoon Noh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Hoon Youn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyojin Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang In Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-013-3299-5-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00436-
dc.contributor.localIdA01281-
dc.contributor.localIdA01774-
dc.contributor.localIdA02583-
dc.contributor.localIdA02988-
dc.contributor.localIdA04382-
dc.contributor.localIdA04102-
dc.contributor.localIdA00925-
dc.contributor.localIdA00996-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00179-
dc.identifier.eissn1534-4681-
dc.identifier.pmid24100960-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1245%2Fs10434-013-3299-5-
dc.subject.keywordOperative Time-
dc.subject.keywordEarly Gastric Cancer-
dc.subject.keywordOncological Outcome-
dc.subject.keywordAdditive Surgery-
dc.subject.keywordEndoscopic Resection-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Moo Jung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jong Won-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Ji Hyun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNoh, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Hyo Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYoun, Young Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Yong Chan-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Seung Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHyung, Woo Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Moo Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorNoh, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Hyo Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYoun, Young Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Yong Chan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHyung, Woo Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Seung Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jong Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Ji Hyun-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume21-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage232-
dc.citation.endPage239-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.21(1) : 232-239, 2014-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.