2 463

Cited 496 times in

Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine for Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After Anthracycline and Taxane Treatment

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author정현철-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-21T16:44:47Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-21T16:44:47Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/96274-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Effective treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. Ixabepilone has single-agent activity in these patients and has demonstrated synergy with capecitabine in this setting. This study was designed to compare ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in anthracycline-pretreated or -resistant and taxane-resistant locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven hundred fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to ixabepilone 40 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) orally on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle, or capecitabine alone 2,500 mg/m(2) on the same schedule, in this international phase III study. The primary end point was progression-free survival evaluated by blinded independent review. RESULTS: Ixabepilone plus capecitabine prolonged progression-free survival relative to capecitabine (median, 5.8 v 4.2 months), with a 25% reduction in the estimated risk of disease progression (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; P = .0003). Objective response rate was also increased (35% v 14%; P < .0001). Grade 3/4 treatment-related sensory neuropathy (21% v 0%), fatigue (9% v 3%), and neutropenia (68% v 11%) were more frequent with combination therapy, as was the rate of death as a result of toxicity (3% v 1%, with patients with liver dysfunction [>/= grade 2 liver function tests] at greater risk). Capecitabine-related toxicities were similar for both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Ixabepilone plus capecitabine demonstrates superior efficacy to capecitabine alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer pretreated or resistant to anthracyclines and resistant to taxanes.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent5210~5217-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAnthracyclines/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHBridged-Ring Compounds/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCapecitabine-
dc.subject.MESHDeoxycytidine/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHDeoxycytidine/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHDeoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives*-
dc.subject.MESHDisease Progression-
dc.subject.MESHEpothilones/administration & dosage*-
dc.subject.MESHEpothilones/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFluorouracil/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHFluorouracil/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHFluorouracil/analogs & derivatives*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Metastasis-
dc.subject.MESHTaxoids/therapeutic use-
dc.titleIxabepilone Plus Capecitabine for Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After Anthracycline and Taxane Treatment-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEva S. Thomas-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHenry L. Gomez-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHenri H. Roché-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLinda T. Vahdat-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPralay Mukhopadhyay-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRonald A. Peck-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGuillermo L. Lerzo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMario Campone-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBinghe Xu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFernando Hurtado de Mendoza-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJudith V. Klimovsky-
dc.contributor.googleauthorXavier B. Pivot-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJacek Jassem-
dc.contributor.googleauthorValorie F. Chan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLuis E. Fein-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun-Cheol Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRubi K. Li-
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6557-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA03773-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01331-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755-
dc.identifier.pmid17968020-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/33/5210.long-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Hyun Cheol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Hyun Cheol-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume25-
dc.citation.number33-
dc.citation.startPage5210-
dc.citation.endPage5217-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.25(33) : 5210-5217, 2007-
dc.identifier.rimsid35026-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.