3 694

Cited 7 times in

A randomised, crossover comparison between the CobraPLA? and the LMA Classic™ in paralysed patients

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author남상범-
dc.contributor.author이종석-
dc.contributor.author장철호-
dc.contributor.author한동우-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-21T16:22:50Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-21T16:22:50Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.issn0003-2409-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/95583-
dc.description.abstractWe performed a randomised, crossover study in 38 anaesthetised and paralysed patients to compare the performance of the CobraPLA® and the LMA Classic™ during controlled ventilation. The median (IQR [range]) airway leak pressure was 23.0 (20–24 [12–30]) cmH2O for the CobraPLA and 15.0 (12–19 [8–30]) cmH2O for the LMA Classic (p < 0.001). The median (IQR [range]) insertion time was 15.0 (11–26 [9–31]) s for the CobraPLA and 22.5 (20–25 [15–50]) s for the LMA Classic (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two devices for the number of insertion and reposition attempts, the anatomical position scored by fibreoptic bronchoscopy or the peak and plateau airway pressures. There were no adverse events during anaesthesia. The CobraPLA provides a better airway leak pressure and takes less time to insert than the LMA Classic in paralysed patients. Our data show that the CobraPLA can be used to secure a patent airway during controlled ventilation in selected patients.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent1285~1288-
dc.relation.isPartOfANAESTHESIA-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleA randomised, crossover comparison between the CobraPLA? and the LMA Classic™ in paralysed patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Anesthesiology (마취통증의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorS. B. Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorD. W. Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ. S. Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorC. H. Chang-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05250.x-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA01253-
dc.contributor.localIdA03485-
dc.contributor.localIdA04274-
dc.contributor.localIdA03141-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00128-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2044-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05250.x/abstract-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNam, Sang Beom-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Jong Seok-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChang, Chul Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHan, Dong Woo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorNam, Sang Beom-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChang, Chul Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Dong Woo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Jong Seok-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume62-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage1285-
dc.citation.endPage1288-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANAESTHESIA, Vol.62(12) : 1285-1288, 2007-
dc.identifier.rimsid43349-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.