288 587

Cited 0 times in

Comparison of elective inguinal node irradiation techniques in anal cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author금기창-
dc.contributor.author금웅섭-
dc.contributor.author성진실-
dc.contributor.author이창걸-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-20T17:40:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-20T17:40:01Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn2234-1900-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/95032-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To compare photon thunderbird with deep match (technique 1) with 3-field technique with electron inguinal boost (technique 2) in acute skin toxicity, toxicity-related treatment breaks and patterns of failure in elective inguinal radiation therapy (RT) for curative chemoradiation in anal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients treated between January 2008 and September 2010 without evidence of inguinal and distant metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. In 9 patients with technique 1, dose to inguinal and whole pelvis area was 41.4 to 45 Gy and total dose was 59.4 Gy. In 8 patients with technique 2, doses to inguinal, whole pelvis, gross tumor were 36 to 41.4 Gy, 36 to 41.4 Gy, and 45 to 54 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up period was 27.6 and 14.8 months in group technique 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: The incidences of grade 3 radiation dermatitis were 56% (5 patients) and 50% (4 patients), dose ranges grade 3 dermatitis appeared were 41.4 to 50.4 Gy and 45 to 54 Gy in group technique 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.819). The areas affected by grade 3 dermatitis in 2 groups were as follow: perianal and perineal areas in 40% and 25%, perianal and inguinal areas in 0% and 50%, and perianal area only in 60% and 25%, respectively (p = 0.196). No inguinal failure has been observed. CONCLUSION: Photon thunderbird with deep match technique and 3-field technique with electron inguinal boost showed similar incidence of radiation dermatitis. However, photon thunderbird with deep match seems to increase the possibility of severe perineal dermatitis-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent236~242-
dc.relation.isPartOfRADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleComparison of elective inguinal node irradiation techniques in anal cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJihye Cha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJinsil Seong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Chang Keum-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Geol Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoong Sub Koom-
dc.identifier.doi10.3857/roj.2011.29.4.236-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00272-
dc.contributor.localIdA00273-
dc.contributor.localIdA01956-
dc.contributor.localIdA03240-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02592-
dc.identifier.eissn2234-3164-
dc.identifier.pmid22984676-
dc.subject.keywordAnus neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordChemoradiotherapy-
dc.subject.keywordToxicity-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKeum, Ki Chang-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKoom, Woong Sub-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSeong, Jin Sil-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Chang Geol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKeum, Ki Chang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKoom, Woong Sub-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSeong, Jin Sil-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Chang Geol-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume29-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage236-
dc.citation.endPage242-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, Vol.29(4) : 236-242, 2011-
dc.identifier.rimsid26995-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.