Cited 191 times in

Incremental prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using CONFIRM: COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry.

Authors
 Benjamin J.W. Chow  ;  Gary Small  ;  Yeung Yam  ;  Li Chen  ;  Stephan Achenbach  ;  Mouaz Al-Mallah  ;  Daniel S. Berman  ;  Matthew J. Budoff  ;  Filippo Cademartiri  ;  Tracy Q. Callister  ;  Hyuk-Jae Chang  ;  Victor Cheng  ;  Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan  ;  Augustin Delago  ;  Allison Dunning  ;  Martin Hadamitzky  ;  Jörg Hausleiter  ;  Philipp Kaufmann  ;  Fay Lin, Erica Maffei  ;  Gilbert L. Raff  ;  Leslee J. Shaw  ;  Todd C. Villines  ;  James K. Min 
Citation
 CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, Vol.4(5) : 463-472, 2011 
Journal Title
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
ISSN
 1941-9651 
Issue Date
2011
MeSH
Cause of Death/trends ; CoronaryAngiography/methods* ; Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging* ; Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Global Health ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; PredictiveValueof Tests ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Registries* ; Risk Assessment/methods* ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods*
Keywords
computed tomography ; prognosis ; all-cause mortality ; left ventricular ejection fraction ; coronary angiography
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Large multicenter studies validating the prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are lacking. We sought to confirm the independent and incremental prognostic value of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity measured using 64-slice CCTA over LVEF and clinical variables.

METHODS AND RESULTS: A large international multicenter registry (CONFIRM Registry) was queried, and CCTA patients with LVEF data on CCTA were screened. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, or cardiac transplantation were excluded. The National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III risk was calculated for each patient, and CCTA was evaluated for CAD severity (normal, nonobstructive, non-high-risk, or high-risk CAD) and LVEF <50%. Patients were followed for an end point of all-cause mortality; 27 125 patients underwent CCTA at 12 participating centers, with a total of 14 064 patients meeting the analysis criteria. Follow-up was available for 13 966 (99.3%) patients (mean follow-up of 22.5 months; 95% confidence interval, 22.3 to 22.7 months). All-cause mortality (271 deaths) occurred in 0.65% of patients without coronary atherosclerosis, 1.99% of patients with nonobstructive CAD, 2.90% of patients with non-high-risk CAD, and 4.95% for patients with high-risk CAD. Multivariable analysis confirmed that LVEF <50% (hazard ratio, 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 2.12 to 3.51) and CAD severity (hazard ratio,1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.42 to 1.76) were predictors of all-cause mortality, and CAD severity had incremental value over LVEF and clinical variables.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that CCTA measures of CAD severity and LVEF have independent prognostic value. Incorporation of CAD severity provides incremental value for predicting all-cause death over routine clinical predictors and LVEF in patients with suspected obstructive CAD
Files in This Item:
T201103303.pdf Download
DOI
10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964155
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Chang, Hyuk-Jae(장혁재) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6139-7545
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/94163
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links