Cited 21 times in
Diagnostic value of anteroposterior diameter of fetal renal pelvis during second and third trimesters in predicting postnatal surgery among Korean population: useful information for antenatal counseling
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이용승 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 정현진 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이혜영 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 임영재 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 한상원 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 홍창희 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-19T17:45:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-19T17:45:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0090-4295 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/91996 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To establish prognostic data regarding fetal hydronephrosis using the anteroposterior diameter (APD) and the need for interventional surgery in the Korean population. METHODS: A total of 187 children with an APD of ≥ 4 mm on obstetric ultrasound scans at any gestational age were retrospectively reviewed. The affected renal units were divided into 2 groups: surgical and nonsurgical. The ultrasound findings were compared at 3 gestational ages: second trimester (15-26 weeks' gestation), early third trimester (27-33 weeks' gestation), and late third trimester (34-40 weeks' gestation). RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.770, 0.828, and 0.812 at the second, early third, and late third trimesters, respectively. A 100% sensitivity for predicting postnatal surgery could be achieved at a cutoff APD of 5 mm during the second trimester, 8 mm during the early third trimester, and 10 mm during the late third trimester if scheduled antenatal ultrasound scans were performed. A cutoff APD of 11 mm during the second trimester was of diagnostic value in selecting children at risk of postnatal surgery with an odds ratio of 5.13 (95% confidence interval 1.62-16.25), with relatively high sensitivity and specificity. With a cutoff of 15 mm during the early third and late third trimesters, the odds ratio was 11.51 (95% confidence interval 5.05-26.23) and 6.94 (95% confidence interval 3.30-14.57), respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with an APD of 10 mm, the most commonly used standard cutoff value in predicting postnatal hydronephrosis and its outcome, an APD cutoff of 5, 8, and 10 mm during the second, early third, and late third trimesters, respectively, is more specific in predicting the need for postnatal surgical intervention in the Korean population. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | open | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | UROLOGY | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/ | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Area Under Curve | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Fetal Diseases/surgery | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Fetus/anatomy & histology | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Gestational Age | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Hydronephrosis/diagnostic imaging* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Hydronephrosis/surgery | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Kidney Pelvis/embryology* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Male | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Postnatal Care | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Predictive Value of Tests | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pregnancy | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pregnancy Trimester, Second | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Pregnancy Trimester, Third | - |
dc.subject.MESH | ROC Curve | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Reference Values | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Republic of Korea | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Ultrasonography, Prenatal* | - |
dc.title | Diagnostic value of anteroposterior diameter of fetal renal pelvis during second and third trimesters in predicting postnatal surgery among Korean population: useful information for antenatal counseling | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine (의과대학) | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Urology (비뇨기과학) | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hyung Joon Kim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hyun Jin Jung | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hye Young Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Yong Seung Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Young Jae Im | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Chang Hee Hong | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Sang Won Han | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.007 | - |
dc.admin.author | false | - |
dc.admin.mapping | false | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A04285 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03316 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A02980 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03772 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03387 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A04447 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J02775 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1527-9995 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22386251 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429512000258 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | * | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lee, Yong Seung | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Jung, Hyun Jin | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lee, Hye Young | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Im, Young Jae | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Han, Sang Won | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Hong, Chang Hee | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Han, Sang Won | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Hye Young | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Yong Seung | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Jung, Hyun Jin | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Im, Young Jae | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Hong, Chang Hee | - |
dc.citation.volume | 79 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1132 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1137 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | UROLOGY, Vol.79(5) : 1132-1137, 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.rimsid | 30057 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.