194 433

Cited 0 times in

Ten-year risk of diagnostic mammograms and invasive breast procedures after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author정인경-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T17:18:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T17:18:22Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn0027-8874-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/91164-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the most common treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); however, how often women experience subsequent diagnostic evaluations over time is not known. METHODS: We identified 2948 women with DCIS who were treated with BCS from 1990 to 2001 and followed for up to 10 years at three integrated health-care delivery systems. We calculated the percentages of diagnostic mammograms and ipsilateral invasive procedures following the initial breast excision to treat DCIS, estimated the 10-year cumulative incidence of these procedures, and determined hazard ratios for both types of procedures with Cox regression modeling. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Over 10 years, 907 women (30.8%) had 1422 diagnostic mammograms and 1813 (61.5%) had 2305 ipsilateral invasive procedures. Diagnostic mammograms occurred in 7.3% of women in the first 6 months and continued at a median annual rate of 4.3%. Ipsilateral invasive procedures occurred in 51.5% of women in the first 6 months and continued at a median annual rate of 3.1%. The estimated 10-year cumulative risk of having at least one diagnostic mammogram after initial DCIS excision was 41.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.5% to 43.5%); at least one invasive procedure, 65.7% (95% CI = 63.7% to 67.8%); and either event, 76.1% (95% CI = 74.1% to 78.1%). Excluding events in the first 6 months following initial DCIS excision, corresponding risks were 36.4% (95% CI = 33.8% to 39.0%) for diagnostic mammograms, 30.4% (95% CI = 26.9% to 33.8%) for invasive procedures, and 49.5% (95% CI = 45.6% to 53.5%) for either event. CONCLUSIONS: Women with DCIS treated with BCS continue to have diagnostic and invasive breast procedures in the conserved breast over an extended period. The frequency of ongoing diagnostic breast evaluations should be included in discussions about treatment-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfJNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHDelivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data-
dc.subject.MESHEarly Detection of Cancer-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIncidence-
dc.subject.MESHMammography/statistics & numerical data*-
dc.subject.MESHMastectomy, Segmental*-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control*-
dc.subject.MESHPatient Selection-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Assessment-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHSEER Program-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHUnited States/epidemiology-
dc.titleTen-year risk of diagnostic mammograms and invasive breast procedures after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biostatistics (의학통계학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLarissaNekhlyudov-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLaurel A.Habel-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNinahAchacoso-
dc.contributor.googleauthorInkyungJung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorReinaHaque-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLaura C.Collins-
dc.contributor.googleauthorStuart J.Schnitt-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCharles P.Quesenberry-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSuzanne W.Fletcher-
dc.identifier.doi22491230-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA03693-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01896-
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2105-
dc.identifier.pmid22491230-
dc.subject.keywordductal carcinoma in situ-
dc.subject.keywordmammography-
dc.subject.keywordbreast-
dc.subject.keyworddiagnosis-
dc.subject.keywordbreast conserving surgery-
dc.subject.keywordexcision-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, In Kyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, In Kyung-
dc.citation.volume104-
dc.citation.number8-
dc.citation.startPage614-
dc.citation.endPage621-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, Vol.104(8) : 614-621, 2012-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Biomedical Systems Informatics (의생명시스템정보학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.