4 594

Cited 0 times in

A split-face comparison of a fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy in acne patients

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author신정우-
dc.contributor.author이주희-
dc.contributor.author정진영-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T17:04:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T17:04:15Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn1476-4172-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/90721-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A number of lasers and light-based devices have been reported as promising treatment options for acne vulgaris. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency (MRF) device treatment compared to CO(2) fractional laser system (FS) for the treatment of acne vulgaris. METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects underwent full-face treatment for acne vulgaris with CO(2) FS and MRF device. For each subject, two passes of CO(2) FS with a pulse energy setting of 80 mJ and a density of 100 spots/cm(2) were used on one side, and two passes of MRF device with a intensity of 8, density of 25 MTZ/cm(2), and a depth of 1.5-2.5 mm were used on the other. Patients were evaluated 3 months postoperatively and were also photographed. RESULTS: Most of the patients improved based on clinical and photographic assessments 3 months after the treatment. No significant differences in physician-measured parameters, patient ratings, or intraoperative pain ratings were found, although downtime was significantly longer for the CO(2) FS treated side. CONCLUSIONS: MRF device and CO(2) FS can be used for acne vulgaris patients and MRF device is more convenient than CO(2) FS because of its short downtime.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF COSMETIC AND LASER THERAPY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAcne Vulgaris/radiotherapy*-
dc.subject.MESHAdolescent-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHFace/radiation effects*-
dc.subject.MESHFar East-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLasers, Gas/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHLasers, Gas/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHLow-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHLow-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHPatient Satisfaction-
dc.subject.MESHRadio Waves/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHRadio Waves/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleA split-face comparison of a fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy in acne patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Dermatology (피부과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung U. Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoo Hyun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Young Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJu Hee Lee-
dc.identifier.doi23016530-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02149-
dc.contributor.localIdA03171-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01354-
dc.identifier.eissn1476-4180-
dc.identifier.pmid23016530-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/14764172.2012.720023-
dc.subject.keywordacne vulgaris-
dc.subject.keywordfractional microneedle radiofrequency-
dc.subject.keywordfractional carbon dioxide laser-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Jung U-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Ju Hee-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Jung U-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Ju Hee-
dc.citation.volume14-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage212-
dc.citation.endPage217-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF COSMETIC AND LASER THERAPY, Vol.14(5) : 212-217, 2012-
dc.identifier.rimsid33492-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Dermatology (피부과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.