Cited 56 times in

Prognostic impact of the cancer stem cell-related marker NANOG in ovarian serous carcinoma

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김상운-
dc.contributor.author김성훈-
dc.contributor.author김영태-
dc.contributor.author김재훈-
dc.contributor.author남은지-
dc.contributor.author이마리아-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T16:56:20Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T16:56:20Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn1048-891X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/90474-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of NANOG expression in ovarian serous carcinoma. METHODS: The expression of NANOG was evaluated in 6 ovarian carcinoma cell lines, paclitaxel-resistant SKOV3 cells, and SKOV3 spheroid cells with semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. NANOG expression was also measured immunohistochemically in a tissue microarray containing ovarian tissues from 74 patients with ovarian serous carcinoma and 24 with ovarian serous cystadenoma. Each sample was scored based on signal intensity and proportion, and a score greater than 4 was considered "positive." RESULTS: NANOG mRNA expression was variable in different ovarian cancer cell lines. The mRNA level of NANOG was increased in the paclitaxel-resistant SKOV3 cells and SKOV3 spheroid cells compared with that in the SKOV3 cells. NANOG expression was positive in 21.6% of 74 ovarian serous carcinoma tissues, but none of the ovarian serous cystadenoma tissues were positive. Positive NANOG expression was associated with residual tumor size after surgery (P = 0.032). The overall survival of the patients with positive NANOG expression was poorer than that of the patients with negative NANOG expression (P = 0.020). In patients with stage I and II disease, positive NANOG expression was independently associated with shorter overall survival compared with negative NANOG expression (40 vs 120 months, respectively; P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Positive NANOG expression is associated with poor prognosis of ovarian serous carcinoma. NANOG has potential as a predictor of survival for patients with ovarian carcinomas and may be involved in the mechanism of chemoresistance.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHBiomarkers, Tumor/genetics-
dc.subject.MESHBiomarkers, Tumor/metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHBiomarkers, Tumor/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHCell Line, Tumor-
dc.subject.MESHCystadenocarcinoma, Serous/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHCystadenocarcinoma, Serous/genetics-
dc.subject.MESHCystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHCystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHDrug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects-
dc.subject.MESHDrug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHHomeodomain Proteins/genetics*-
dc.subject.MESHHomeodomain Proteins/metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHHomeodomain Proteins/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNanog Homeobox Protein-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplastic Stem Cells/metabolism*-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplastic Stem Cells/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHOvarian Neoplasms/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHOvarian Neoplasms/genetics-
dc.subject.MESHOvarian Neoplasms/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHOvarian Neoplasms/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHPaclitaxel/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Analysis-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titlePrognostic impact of the cancer stem cell-related marker NANOG in ovarian serous carcinoma-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology (산부인과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Maria-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNam, Eun Ji-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sang Wun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sunghoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jae Hoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Young Tae-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/IGJ.0b013e3182738307-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00595-
dc.contributor.localIdA00526-
dc.contributor.localIdA00729-
dc.contributor.localIdA00876-
dc.contributor.localIdA01262-
dc.contributor.localIdA02748-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01115-
dc.identifier.eissn1525-1438-
dc.identifier.pmid23095773-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00009577-201211000-00008&LSLINK=80&D=ovft-
dc.subject.keywordNANOG-
dc.subject.keywordCancer stem cell-
dc.subject.keywordOvarian cancer-
dc.subject.keywordChemoresistance-
dc.subject.keywordPrognosis-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Sang Wun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Young Tae-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jae Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNam, Eun Ji-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Maria-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Sang Wun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Young Tae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jae Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorNam, Eun Ji-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Maria-
dc.citation.volume22-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startPage1489-
dc.citation.endPage1496-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol.22(9) : 1489-1496, 2012-
dc.identifier.rimsid32789-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.