3 343

Cited 9 times in

Influence of nanocoated calcium phosphate on two different types of implant surfaces in different bone environment: an animal study

Authors
 Jung-Yoo Choi  ;  Ui-Won Jung  ;  Chang-Sung Kim  ;  Sung-Min Jung  ;  In-Seop Lee  ;  Seong-Ho Choi 
Citation
 CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Vol.24(9) : 1018-1022, 2013 
Journal Title
 CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH 
ISSN
 0905-7161 
Issue Date
2013
MeSH
Animals ; Calcium Phosphates/chemistry* ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible ; Dental Etching/methods ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods* ; Dental Implants* ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dogs ; Male ; Osseointegration/physiology* ; Surface Properties ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket/surgery
Keywords
calcium phosphate ; defect ; dental implants ; intrabony ; surface
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of two different types of surfaces, smooth and roughened surface implants nanocoated with calcium phosphate (CAP) around different bone environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five male mongrel dogs were used in this study. The premolars and molars were extracted on both sides of the mandible. Eight weeks after extraction, implants were submerged on both sides of the mandible. On the left, CAP nanocoated roughened surface (RCAP) implants were installed whereas, the CAP nanocoated smooth surface (SCAP) implants were installed on the right side. The control group had no defect, on the other hand, three-wall intrabony defects were surgically created adjacent to the implant in the experimental group. The dogs were sacrificed after 12 weeks. RESULTS: Histological and histomorphometrical analysis were performed with the specimen. The SCAP and RCAP implants showed good osseointegration with no statistical significance in the control group. Histologically, the SCAP group showed little resolution of the defect compared with the RCAP group. In the experimental groups, there was a significant difference in defect fill between SCAP and RCAP. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of our study, it can be concluded that SCAP and RCAP implants show no difference in sufficient bone area whereas, CAP nanocoating on roughened implant surface may enhance osseointegration in deficient bone environment.
Full Text
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02492.x/abstract
DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02492.x
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Periodontics (치주과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Chang Sung(김창성) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3902-1071
Jung, Ui Won(정의원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4172
Choi, Seong Ho(최성호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6704-6124
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/87474
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links