Cited 56 times in
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Cytologically Proven Node-positive Breast Cancer at Diagnosis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 박지민 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박형석 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 조정훈 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김승일 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박병우 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박세호 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-18T09:01:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-18T09:01:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1068-9265 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/87398 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background The performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) was investigated in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Methods After NCT of 178 patients with cytology-proven axillary/supraclavicular nodes metastasis at the time of diagnosis, SLNB using radioisotope was performed including completion node dissection between 2008 and 2011. The detection rate, sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of SLNB were analyzed. Results SLNB was successfully performed in 169 (94.9 %) patients. Tumor nonresponse and extensive residual nodal disease were found to be significantly associated with detection failure of sentinel nodes. Sensitivity, FNR, NPV, and accuracy of SLNB were 78.0, 22.0, 75.8, and 87.0 %, respectively, and a greater number of retrieved SLNs increased all four of these performance measures. Conversion to node-negative disease was achieved in 69 (40.8 %) patients: 24 % of patients with the luminal A subtype, 51.6 % of patients with the luminal B, 51.7 % of patients with the HER2-enriched, and 58.5 % of patients with the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Luminal B, HER2-enriched, and TNBC subtypes showed comparable responses to NCT; however, the TNBC subtype had a significantly better FNR and accuracy. Conclusions SLNB was found to be technically feasible, but its routine use was not recommended for LABCs after NCT. However, acceptable performance was noted for locally advanced TNBCs, and thus SLNB might be safely considered in these selected patients. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | open | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/ | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Adult | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Axilla | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Breast Neoplasms/pathology | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Combined Modality Therapy | - |
dc.subject.MESH | False Negative Reactions | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Female | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Follow-Up Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymph Node Excision | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymph Nodes/pathology* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymph Nodes/surgery | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Lymphatic Metastasis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Neoadjuvant Therapy* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Neoplasm Staging | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prognosis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Prospective Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy | - |
dc.title | Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Cytologically Proven Node-positive Breast Cancer at Diagnosis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine (의과대학) | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Surgery (외과학) | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Seho Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Ji Min Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jung Hoon Cho | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hyung Seok Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Seung Il Kim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Byeong-Woo Park | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1245/s10434-013-2992-8 | - |
dc.admin.author | false | - |
dc.admin.mapping | false | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01685 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01753 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03906 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A00658 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01475 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01524 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J00179 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1534-4681 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24267732 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-013-2992-8 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | False negative rate | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Fine needle aspiration cytology | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Identification rate | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Sentinel lymph node biopsy | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Park, Ji Min | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Park, Hyung Seok | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Cho, Jung Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Seung Il | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Park, Byeong Woo | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Park, Se Ho | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Ji Min | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Hyung Seok | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Cho, Jung Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Seung Il | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Byeong Woo | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Se Ho | - |
dc.rights.accessRights | not free | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 9 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 2858 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 2865 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.20(9) : 2858-2865, 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.rimsid | 33030 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.