497 725

Cited 23 times in

Low-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Without Visible Tumor (T1c) On Multiparametric MRI Could Qualify for Active Surveillance Candidate Even If They Did Not Meet Inclusion Criteria of Active Surveillance Protocol

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author구교철-
dc.contributor.author나군호-
dc.contributor.author이동훈-
dc.contributor.author이승환-
dc.contributor.author정병하-
dc.contributor.author최영득-
dc.contributor.author홍성준-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-18T08:46:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-18T08:46:40Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn0368-2811-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/86933-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: We compared the pathologic outcomes of prostate cancer patients who did not qualify for active surveillance according to the tumor visibility on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 464 prostate cancer patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before radical prostatectomy between 2006 and 2012. All the patients had clinically localized prostate cancer with Gleason score ≤6 and prostate-specific antigen ≤10 ng/ml. Of these patients, 238 were eligible for active surveillance (group A) and 226 were not. We divided these 226 patients into two groups according to the result of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: 59 (26.1%) patients without visible tumor (group B) and 167 (73.9%) patients with visible tumor (group C). We evaluated the pathologic outcomes of organ-confined Gleason ≤6 disease and unfavorable disease in each group. RESULTS: The proportions of organ-confined Gleason ≤6 disease and unfavorable disease were 63.9 and 11.3% in group A, 59.3 and 10.2% in group B, and 38.9 and 22.8% in Group C. Comparing group A and B, these proportions were not statistically different (P = 0.549 and P = 1.000, respectively). However, comparing group A and C, those were significantly different (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, no visible tumor on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was an independent predictor of organ-confined Gleason score 6 disease (odds ratio 0.426, P = 0.007) but there was no statistically independent predictor for unfavorable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The tumor visibility on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could be a predictor of favorable disease for the prostate cancer patients who did not meet active surveillance criteria. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could help to determine treatment modality for the low-risk prostate cancer patients who consider active surveillance even if they did not meet active surveillance criteria.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfJAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHClinical Protocols-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHKaplan-Meier Estimate-
dc.subject.MESHLogistic Models-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging*/methods-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMultivariate Analysis-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Grading-
dc.subject.MESHOdds Ratio-
dc.subject.MESHPopulation Surveillance*-
dc.subject.MESHPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.MESHProstate-Specific Antigen/metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms/immunology-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Assessment-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHWatchful Waiting*-
dc.titleLow-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Without Visible Tumor (T1c) On Multiparametric MRI Could Qualify for Active Surveillance Candidate Even If They Did Not Meet Inclusion Criteria of Active Surveillance Protocol-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Urology (비뇨기과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Hoon Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyo Chul Koo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Hwan Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKoon Ho Rha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Deuk Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Joon Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Ha Chung-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jjco/hyt041-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02742-
dc.contributor.localIdA02938-
dc.contributor.localIdA00188-
dc.contributor.localIdA01227-
dc.contributor.localIdA03607-
dc.contributor.localIdA04111-
dc.contributor.localIdA04402-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01207-
dc.identifier.eissn1465-3621-
dc.identifier.pmid23580758-
dc.subject.keywordlow-risk prostate cancer-
dc.subject.keywordmagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.keywordactive surveillance-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKoo, Kyo Chul-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Seung Hwan-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Byung Ha-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Young Deuk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Sung Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Seung Hwan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKoo, Kyo Chul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Byung Ha-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Young Deuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Sung Joon-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume43-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage553-
dc.citation.endPage558-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.43(5) : 553-558, 2013-
dc.identifier.rimsid32045-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.