1 607

Cited 139 times in

Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound and Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Long Coronary Artery Stenoses

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author고영국-
dc.contributor.author김병극-
dc.contributor.author김중선-
dc.contributor.author신동호-
dc.contributor.author장양수-
dc.contributor.author최동훈-
dc.contributor.author홍명기-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-18T08:42:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-18T08:42:55Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn1936-8798-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/86819-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance on clinical outcomes following drug-eluting stent implantation when treating long lesions. BACKGROUND: The role of IVUS guidance when treating long lesions has been tested during bare-metal stent, but not during drug-eluting stent, implantation. METHODS: A total of 543 patients treated with stents ≥ 28 mm in length were randomly assigned to IVUS guidance (n = 269) versus angiography guidance (n = 274). The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 1 year following intervention. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, total stent length was 32.4 mm in the IVUS-guided arm versus 32.3 mm in angiography-guided arm (p = 0.84). Adjunct post-dilation was more frequently performed in the IVUS-guided arm (54.6% vs. 44.5%, p = 0.03); post-intervention minimal lumen diameters were similar (2.55 vs. 2.55 mm, respectively, p = 0.50); and MACE occurred in 12 (4.5%) patients in IVUS-guided arm and in 20 (7.3%) patients in the angiography-guided arm (p = 0.16). However, among the 269 patients assigned to IVUS guidance, IVUS was not used in 13 patients (4.8%); conversely, in 274 patients assigned to angiography alone, 41 patients (15.0%) were treated with IVUS guidance. Therefore, in a per-protocol analysis according to actual IVUS usage, minimum lumen diameter was larger (2.58 vs. 2.51 mm, p = 0.04), and MACE rates were lower: 4.0% in the IVUS-guided arm versus 8.1% in the angiography-guided arm (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of routine IVUS for drug-eluting stent implantation in long lesions did not improve the 1-year MACE rates. The IVUS use per operator decision was associated with improved results. (A New Strategy Regarding Discontinuation of Dual Antiplatelet; NCT01145079).-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfJACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHChi-Square Distribution-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Angiography*-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Stenosis/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Stenosis/therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Thrombosis/etiology-
dc.subject.MESHDisease-Free Survival-
dc.subject.MESHDrug-Eluting Stents*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHKaplan-Meier Estimate-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMyocardial Infarction/etiology-
dc.subject.MESHPercutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHPercutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation*-
dc.subject.MESHPercutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHProsthesis Design-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Interventional*-
dc.titleRandomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound and Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Long Coronary Artery Stenoses-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Sun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae-Soo Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGary S. Mintz-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByoung-Eun Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong-Ho Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByeong-Keuk Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Guk Ko-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDonghoon Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYangsoo Jang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Ki Hong-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.009-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00127-
dc.contributor.localIdA00493-
dc.contributor.localIdA00961-
dc.contributor.localIdA02097-
dc.contributor.localIdA03448-
dc.contributor.localIdA04053-
dc.contributor.localIdA04391-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01193-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-7605-
dc.identifier.pmid23523455-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879813004329-
dc.subject.keywordcoronary artery disease-
dc.subject.keyworddrug-eluting stent-
dc.subject.keywordintravascular ultrasound-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Byeong Keuk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jung Sun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Dong Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Myeong Ki-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Byeong Keuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jung Sun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Dong Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Myeong Ki-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume6-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage369-
dc.citation.endPage376-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Vol.6(4) : 369-376, 2013-
dc.identifier.rimsid29224-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.