304 718

Cited 0 times in

The ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author남은지-
dc.contributor.author박현종-
dc.contributor.author임가원-
dc.contributor.author정다은-
dc.contributor.author조한별-
dc.contributor.author김상운-
dc.contributor.author김성훈-
dc.contributor.author김영태-
dc.contributor.author김재훈-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-18T08:39:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-18T08:39:28Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn2287-8572-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/86714-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare postoperative surgical site pain in gynecologic cancer patients who underwent elective extended lower midline laparotomy and managed their pain with either the ON-Q pain management system (surgical incision site pain relief system, ON-Q pump) or an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia pump (IV PCA). METHODS: Twenty gynecologic cancer patients who underwent elective extended lower midline laparotomy were divided into two groups. One group received a 72-hour continuous wound perfusion of the local anesthetic ropivacaine (0.5%, study group) into the supraperitoneal layer of the abdominal incision through the ON-Q pump. The other group received intravenous infusion pump of patient-controlled analgesia (fentanyl citrate 20 mg/mL · kg+ondansetron hydrochloride 16 mg/8 mL+normal saline). Postoperative pain was assessed immediately and at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery using the visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Postoperative surgical site pain scores at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery were lower in the ON-Q group than the IV PCA group. Pain scores at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery were significantly different between the two groups (P=0.023, P<0.001). Overall painkiller administration was higher in the ON-Q group but this difference was not statistically significant (5.1 vs. 4.3, P=0.481). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the ON-Q pain management system is a more effective approach than IV PCA for acute postoperative surgical site pain relief after extended lower midline laparotomy in gynecologic cancer patients.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfObstetrics & Gynecology Science-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleThe ON-Q pain management system in elective gynecology oncologic surgery: Management of postoperative surgical site pain compared to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology (산부인과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDawn Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo Jin Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMi Hyun Jo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun Jong Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGa Won Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHanbyoul Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Ji Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Wun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Hoon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Tae Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSunghoon Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.5468/OGS.2013.56.2.93-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00595-
dc.contributor.localIdA01262-
dc.contributor.localIdA01746-
dc.contributor.localIdA03354-
dc.contributor.localIdA03589-
dc.contributor.localIdA03921-
dc.contributor.localIdA00526-
dc.contributor.localIdA00729-
dc.contributor.localIdA00876-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02408-
dc.identifier.pmid24327987-
dc.subject.keywordAnalgesia-
dc.subject.keywordGynecologic neoplasm-
dc.subject.keywordLocal anesthesia-
dc.subject.keywordPostoperative pain-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNam, Eun Ji-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Hyun Jong-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYim, Ga Won-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Da Wn-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Han Byoul-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Sang Wun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Young Tae-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jae Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorNam, Eun Ji-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Hyun Jong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYim, Ga Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Da Wn-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, Han Byoul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Sang Wun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Young Tae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jae Hoon-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume56-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage93-
dc.citation.endPage101-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationObstetrics & Gynecology Science, Vol.56(2) : 93-101, 2013-
dc.identifier.rimsid29158-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.