13 20

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Raw, centile and individualised minimal clinically important differences for the MMN-Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale© in the monitoring of multifocal motor neuropathy

Authors
 Rajabally, Yusuf A.  ;  Al-Areed, Ahmad  ;  Iqbal, Roshan  ;  Noushad, Muhammed A.  ;  Min, Young G.  ;  Osman, Chinar 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Vol.273(5), 2026-04 
Article Number
 289 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
ISSN
 0340-5354 
Issue Date
2026-04
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Disability Evaluation* ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimal Clinically Important Difference* ; Polyneuropathies* / diagnosis ; Polyneuropathies* / physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index*
Keywords
Centile ; Individualised ; Minimal clinically important difference ; MMN-RODS ; Multifocal motor neuropathy ; Outcomes ; Raw
Abstract
Background Optimal clinical application of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the MMN-Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (c) (MMN-RODS) scale is unknown. Methods We retrospectively studied subjects with MMN from 2 UK neuropathy centres. Raw and centile MMN-RODS scores were collected, at initial, two intermediate, and latest assessment, and distribution-based MCIDs determined at studied time-points. The sensitivities of raw, centile and individualised MCIDs, were compared. Results We included 32 consecutive subjects with MMN on individualised immunoglobulin dosing regimens. First intermediate, second intermediate, and latest assessments were performed at a median of 17.0, 54.1 and 74.6 months from onset, respectively. Progressive amelioration of mean raw MMN-RODS score occurred between initial and latest assessment. The distribution-based raw MMN-RODS MCID was of 3, 4 and 5, and the distribution-based centile MMN-RODS MCID was of 6, 7 and 7, at first intermediate, second intermediate and latest assessment, respectively. At first intermediate assessment, raw and individualised MCIDs were equally sensitive, and both more sensitive than centile MCID (McNemar's Test: p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Raw MCID, centile MCID and individualised MCID, all had equivalent sensitivity at the second intermediate and latest assessment. Neither initial MMN-RODS score, nor amplitude of treatment-induced changes in early disease stages, independently predicted total improvement amplitude or final outcome. Conclusions MMN-RODS MCID cut-offs may require adaption to assessment timing. In earlier stages, raw/individualised MCID may be more sensitive than centile MCID, whereas all three methods may subsequently be equivalent. Initial disability and early treatment response do not predict achievable total improvement amplitude nor final outcome.
Files in This Item:
93294.pdf Download
DOI
10.1007/s00415-026-13771-8
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurology (신경과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Min, Young Gi(민영기)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/212776
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links