7 18

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

The IMPACT framework for evaluating generative AI in critical care: development and multinational consensus validation

Authors
 Yeh, Yu-Chang  ;  Shih, Ming-Chieh  ;  De Backer, Daniel  ;  Celi, Leo Anthony  ;  See, Kay Choong  ;  Fujii, Tomoko  ;  Ling, Lowell  ;  Mongkolpun, Wasineenart  ;  Hu, Hsiang-Wei  ;  Chen, Hsuan-Yu  ;  Chen, Wei-Cheng  ;  Cholley, Bernard  ;  Fong, Kean Khang  ;  Ryu, Ho-Geol  ;  Na, Sungwon  ;  Egi, Moritoki  ;  Chan, Wing-Sum  ;  Chen, Kuan-Fu  ;  Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan  ;  Chuang, Yu-Chen  ;  Yang, Chi-Ju  ;  Hsiao, Wei-Ling  ;  Lai, Sheng-Ru  ;  Ku, David  ;  Jahan, Ahsina  ;  Martin, Greg S. 
Citation
 ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, Vol.16, 2026-05 
Article Number
 100078 
Journal Title
ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE
ISSN
 2110-5820 
Issue Date
2026-05
Keywords
Generative artificial intelligence ; Critical care ; Clinical decision support ; Content validity ; Consensus
Abstract
Background: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used for clinical decision support in critical care, yet standardized methods for evaluating GenAI content in intensive care settings are lacking. Existing metrics assess textual similarity but fail to capture clinical accuracy, reasoning quality, or urgency. Methods: We developed and validated the IMPACT framework through a five-phase multinational panel consensus process. Reporting adhered to the ACCORD guideline. A steering committee of eight persons provided clinical and methodological oversight. Panelists were recruited through purposive sampling to ensure geographic and multidisciplinary representation. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Item-level Content Validity Index (I-CVI), with retention thresholds set at 70% agreement and I-CVI >= 0.80. Results: A total of 58 panelists from 12 countries and regions participated, with 42 completing formal consensus voting. Participants included intensivists, physicians with AI research expertise, information technology specialists, and other critical care professionals. All six IMPACT domains exceeded validity thresholds (mean agreement 89.3%, CVR = 0.79, I-CVI = 0.92). Of 24 candidate subitems, 21 met retention criteria (mean agreement 85.7%, CVR = 0.71, I-CVI = 0.90). Three subitems were removed due to insufficient consensus and conceptual overlap. The validated framework comprises six domains with 21 subitems. Conclusions: The IMPACT framework provides a consensus-validated approach for evaluating GenAI clinical decision support in intensive care, addressing gaps in current evaluation methods.
Files in This Item:
93160.pdf Download
DOI
10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100078
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Na, Sungwon(나성원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-8042
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/212645
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links