34 39

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

SpyGlass Direct Visualization System: A Cost-Effective Approach Enhancing Nutritional and Immune Recovery in Difficult Bile Duct Stone Management

Authors
 Shin, Kyung In  ;  Leem, Galam  ;  Koo, Jungchul  ;  Kim, Jee Hoon  ;  Cho, In Rae  ;  Jo, Jung Hyun  ;  Lee, Hee Seung  ;  Park, Jeong Youp  ;  Bang, Seungmin  ;  Park, Seung Woo  ;  Chung, Moon Jae 
Citation
 YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, Vol.67(6) : 466-476, 2026-06 
Journal Title
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN
 0513-5796 
Issue Date
2026-06
MeSH
Aged ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Gallstones* / surgery ; Gallstones* / therapy ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Lithotripsy* / economics ; Lithotripsy* / methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Gallstones ; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ; SpyGlass ; single operator cholangioscopy ; percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy ; cost-benefit analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The SpyGlass DS II Direct Visualization System (SpyDS) is increasingly used as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) for difficult bile duct stones (DBDSs). This study compared clinical outcomes, costs, and post-procedural recovery between SpyDS and PTCS. Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted including patients with DBDSs who underwent Spy-DS-guided lithotripsy between December 2020 and December 2022. Patients treated with PTCS-guided lithotripsy between July 2018 and July 2020 were used as a comparison group. Primary endpoints were technical success rate and total hospital cost. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, procedure-related cost, adverse events, and markers of recovery, such as nutritional status, immune balance, and skeletal muscle mass. Results: Forty-three patients were included: 20 patients in the SpyDS group and 23 patients in the PTCS group. Technical success rates were 95.0% for SpyDS and 100% for PTCS. Median total hospital cost was lower in the SpyDS group in univariable analysis (p=0.018), although this difference was not significant after multivariable adjustment. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (6.5 days vs. 21.0 days; p<0.001). The SpyDS group showed more favorable early recovery patterns, including higher albumin levels and lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios at follow-up, as well as less rapid muscle loss. Conclusion: SpyDS achieved comparable technical success to PTCS and was associated with a markedly shorter hospitalization period. Although adjusted analyses did not show a significant cost difference, the shorter length of stay and favorable recovery trends suggest potential clinical and economic advantages. SpyDS may represent a practical alternative for DBDSs management. ClinicalTrials.gov trial number: NCT04743089
Files in This Item:
93226.pdf Download
DOI
10.3349/ymj.2025.0006
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jee Hoon(김지훈)
Park, Seung Woo(박승우) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8230-964X
Park, Jeong Youp(박정엽) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0110-8606
Bang, Seungmin(방승민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5209-8351
Lee, Hee Seung(이희승) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2825-3160
Leem, Ga Lam(임가람) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6490-0911
Chung, Moon Jae(정문재) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5920-8549
Jo, Jung Hyun(조중현) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2641-8873
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/212609
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links