0 49

Cited 0 times in

Cited 2 times in

A Matched Case-Control Study of the Relationship Between Radiation Dose to the Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With and Without Internal Mammary Lymph Node Relapses

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorNichol, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorWade, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorGondara, Lovedeep-
dc.contributor.authorMusoke, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Jee Suk-
dc.contributor.authorSwift, Carrie-Lynne-
dc.contributor.authorChng, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorNarinesingh, Dylan-
dc.contributor.authorSpeers, Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorLohrisch, Caroline-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-04T04:56:17Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-04T04:56:17Z-
dc.date.created2026-04-29-
dc.date.issued2025-09-
dc.identifier.issn0360-3016-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/212062-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group&apos;s 2023 meta-analysis of radiation therapy to regional nodes in early breast cancer demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) without an associated improvement in locoregional recurrence in the trials comparing internal mammary node (IMN) irradiation versus none. We aimed to study cases with IMN relapse (IMNR) and controls without IMNR to examine the link between IMNR and OS. Methods and Materials: Patients treated curatively between 2005 and 2014, who subsequently developed IMNR, were identified in a population-based database. The IMNR cases were matched 1:2 to controls without IMNR using patient and tumor characteristics. The internal mammary vessels in the first 3 intercostal spaces were outlined on planning computed tomography scans as the IMN clinical target volume, and the mean equivalent doses in 2-Gy fractions to the IMNs were calculated. Multivariable Fine and Gray competing-risk regression and Cox regression were used to evaluate the effect of the baseline patient, tumor, and treatment variables, including therapeutic IMN irradiation with ≥40 Gy on IMNR and OS. Results: Seventy cases were matched with 140 controls. Median follow-up was 9.1 years, median tumor size was 25 mm, and N-stages were: 37% N0, 33% N1, and 30% N2-3. The medians of the IMN doses were 4.1 Gy for cases and 13.7 Gy for controls (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, worse IMNR was associated with mastectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.11; P = .02), and better IMNR was associated with therapeutic IMN irradiation (HR, 0.36; P = .009); worse OS was associated with larger tumor size (HR, 1.02; P = .006), ≥10 positive axillary nodes (HR, 3.15; P = .04), and triple-negative subtype (HR, 2.92; P = .03), and better OS was associated with therapeutic IMN irradiation (HR, 0.49; P = .02). Conclusions: We demonstrated that therapeutic IMN irradiation with ≥40 Gy was associated with both a lower risk of IMNR and improved OS. © 2025 Elsevier Inc.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc.-
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics-
dc.relation.isPartOfINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms* / mortality-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms* / radiotherapy-
dc.subject.MESHCase-Control Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Nodes* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Nodes* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Nodes* / radiation effects-
dc.subject.MESHLymphatic Irradiation* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHLymphatic Metastasis / radiotherapy-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Recurrence, Local* / mortality-
dc.subject.MESHRadiotherapy Dosage-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleA Matched Case-Control Study of the Relationship Between Radiation Dose to the Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With and Without Internal Mammary Lymph Node Relapses-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNichol, Alan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWade, Louise-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGondara, Lovedeep-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMusoke, Richard-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang, Jee Suk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSwift, Carrie-Lynne-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChng, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNarinesingh, Dylan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSpeers, Caroline-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLohrisch, Caroline-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.02.007-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01157-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-355X-
dc.identifier.pmid39986486-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301625001440-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChang, Jee Suk-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105000059993-
dc.citation.volume123-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage150-
dc.citation.endPage160-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol.123(1) : 150-160, 2025-09-
dc.identifier.rimsid92645-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.