0 6

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

C-Terminal Truncation and Fusion Partner Determine Oncogenicity of FGFR3

Authors
 Yemelyanenko, Julia  ;  Bhin, Jinhyuk  ;  Van Der Burg, Eline  ;  Drenth, Anne Paulien  ;  Lee, Jessica K.  ;  Lutz, Catrin  ;  Dorner, Lea  ;  Wientjens, Ellen  ;  Klarenbeek, Sjoerd  ;  Song, Ji-Ying  ;  Moon, Hyeonjin  ;  Annunziato, Stefano  ;  Proost, Natalie  ;  Siteur, Bjorn  ;  Ross, Jeffrey S.  ;  Van De Ven, Marieke  ;  Van Tellingen, Olaf  ;  Ganesan, Shridar  ;  Wessels, Lodewyk F. A.  ;  Zingg, Daniel  ;  Jonkers, Jos 
Citation
 CANCER RESEARCH, Vol.86(6) : 1372-1391, 2026-03 
Journal Title
CANCER RESEARCH
ISSN
 0008-5472 
Issue Date
2026-03
MeSH
Animals ; Carcinogenesis* / genetics ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Female ; Humans ; Mice ; Microtubule-Associated Proteins ; Neoplasms* / genetics ; Neoplasms* / pathology ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion* / genetics ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2 / genetics ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3* / genetics ; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3* / metabolism
Abstract
Genomic alterations affecting components of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling axis can trigger aberrant pathway activation and tumor development. Genomic truncation of the FGF receptor 2 (FGFR2) exon 18 (E18) disrupts the FGFR2 carboxy (C)-terminal tail, acting as a potent driver alteration across multiple tumor types. In this study, we analyzed human oncogenomic datasets to reveal that E18 truncations are similarly prevalent in FGFR3, an FGFR2 paralog. FGFR3 E18 truncations primarily occur due to rearrangements (RE) that involve transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 3 (TACC3), resulting in FGFR3 Delta E18-TACC3 gene fusions. In contrast to E18-truncated FGFR2, functional in vitro and in vivo examination of Fgfr3 variants demonstrated that the truncation of Fgfr3 E18 is insufficient to promote oncogenic activity in cell lines or in the lungs and mammary glands of mice. Only the combination of an Fgfr3 E18 truncation with a RE partner gene that encodes a receptor-dimerizing domain resulted in the development of tumors, which were sensitive to FGFR inhibition. Overall, these findings suggest that patients with cancers that are positive for rearranged FGFR3, resulting in E18 truncation and a fusion to dimerizing partners, should be considered for FGFR-targeted therapies.Significance: FGFR3, unlike its paralog FGFR2, requires both a C-terminal truncation and fusion to a partner gene that retains the expression of a dimerizing domain to effectively drive oncogenic signaling and tumorigenesis.
Full Text
https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/86/6/1372/775086/C-Terminal-Truncation-and-Fusion-Partner-Determine
DOI
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-2648
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Biomedical Systems Informatics (의생명시스템정보학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Bhin, Jinhyuk(빈진혁)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211662
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links