8 11

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Combined therapy with dutasteride and tadalafil vs dutasteride or tadalafil monotherapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomised phase III trial

Authors
 Lee, Seung Wook  ;  Lee, Seung Hwan  ;  Kim, Jae Heon  ;  Noh, Joon Hwa  ;  Lee, Jun Ho  ;  Ha, U-syn  ;  Oh, Cheol Young  ;  Kang, Taek Won  ;  Lee, Gyeongseop  ;  Lee, Sangchul  ;  Han, Deok Hyun  ;  Han, Jun Hyun  ;  Song, Sang Hoon  ;  Park, Hyun Jun  ;  Chung, Byung Ha  ;  Min, Gyeong Eun  ;  Jeong, In Gab  ;  Moon, Kyung Hyun  ;  Kim, Won Tae  ;  Lee, Ji Youl  ;  Kim, Choung-soo 
Citation
 BJU INTERNATIONAL, Vol.137(4) : 698-707, 2026-04 
Journal Title
BJU INTERNATIONAL
ISSN
 1464-4096 
Issue Date
2026-04
MeSH
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors* / administration & dosage ; 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors* / therapeutic use ; Aged ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Dutasteride* / administration & dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors* / administration & dosage ; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors* / therapeutic use ; Prostatic Hyperplasia* / drug therapy ; Tadalafil* / administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
dutasteride ; tadalafil ; benign prostatic hyperplasia ; fixed-dose combination ; LUTS
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dutasteride and tadalafil vs monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and Methods This phase III trial enrolled 667 patients. After screening and washout, eligible patients were stratified by the baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and randomised (1:1:1) to receive FDC dutasteride 0.5 mg/tadalafil 5 mg (FDC 0.5/5 mg), dutasteride 0.5 mg, or tadalafil 5 mg for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in total IPSS from baseline to Week 48. Efficacy and safety were assessed at 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Results In total, 619 patients were analysed for efficacy. The least squares (LS) mean (standard error [se]) change in total IPSS at 48 weeks from baseline was -9.49 (0.37) for the FDC 0.5/5 mg group vs -4.40 (0.37) for dutasteride 0.5 mg group (LS mean difference [LSMD] -5.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.13 to -4.50; P < 0.001), and -9.53 (0.36) for the FDC 0.5/5 mg group vs -4.24 (0.37) for tadalafil 5 mg group (LSMD -5.29, 95% CI -6.30 to -4.27; P < 0.001). The FDC 0.5/5 mg group demonstrated the most pronounced improvement in quality of life. Although the maximum urinary flow rate and post-void residual volume improved in all groups, differences were not statistically significant. In the comparison between the FDC 0.5/5 mg and dutasteride 0.5 mg groups, the LSMD (95% CI) of change from baseline to Week 48 in the international index of erectile function - erectile function (IIEF - EF) total score was 4.03 (2.35 to -5.71) (P < 0.05). Among the 655 patients analysed for safety, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 32.88% (FDC 0.5/5 mg) vs 21.20% (dutasteride 0.5 mg) and 26.48% (tadalafil 5 mg), with few serious adverse events observed. Conclusions The FDC 0.5/5 mg demonstrated superior efficacy, and an acceptable safety profile compared with dutasteride and tadalafil monotherapies in patients with BPH.
Files in This Item:
91709.pdf Download
DOI
10.1111/bju.70163
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Seung Hwan(이승환) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-8544
Chung, Byung Ha(정병하) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-3660
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211238
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links