0 15

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Amlodipine Combination Therapy in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled on Monotherapy

Authors
 Kim, Dae-Hee  ;  Lee, Sang Hyun  ;  Han, Kyung Ah  ;  Kim, Moo Hyun  ;  Choi, Dong-Ju  ;  Grabowski, Marcin  ;  Miekus, Pawel  ;  Wang, Tzung-Dau  ;  Chen, Ching-Pei  ;  Park, Sungha 
Citation
 CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, Vol.48(2) : 159-169, 2026-02 
Article Number
 PMID 7706726 
Journal Title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
ISSN
 0149-2918 
Issue Date
2026-02
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Amlodipine* / administration & dosage ; Amlodipine* / adverse effects ; Amlodipine* / therapeutic use ; Antihypertensive Agents* / administration & dosage ; Antihypertensive Agents* / adverse effects ; Antihypertensive Agents* / therapeutic use ; Benzimidazoles* / administration & dosage ; Benzimidazoles* / adverse effects ; Benzimidazoles* / therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure / drug effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Essential Hypertension ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension* / drug therapy ; Hypertension* / physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Oxadiazoles* / administration & dosage ; Oxadiazoles* / adverse effects ; Oxadiazoles* / therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Amlodipine ; Azilsartan medoxomil ; Blood pressure ; Combination therapy ; Hypertension
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZM) and amlodipine (AML) combination therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled by AZM or AML monotherapy. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind Phase III study (NCT05385770), patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with AZM 40/80 mg or AML 5/10 mg were randomized (1:1:1) to receive low-dose or high-dose AZM/AML combination therapy or continued monotherapy as control. Eligible patients completed a 4-week active run-in period before randomization. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 8 weeks of treatment. Findings: A total of 890 patients were randomized. AZM/AML combination therapy resulted in significantly greater reductions in mean sitting SBP compared with AZM or AML monotherapy across all dose groups. Least-squares mean reductions in mean sitting SBP at week 8 ranged from 5.2 to 9.0 mm Hg across all monotherapy nonresponder groups, with all comparisons showing statistical significance (P < 0.05). Reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure also favored combination therapy. Safety profiles were comparable across all treatment arms, with most adverse events mild or moderate in severity. No additional safety concerns were identified compared with monotherapy. Implications: AZM/AML combination therapy was more effective than monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with either agent alone, even at maximum doses. Both low-dose and high-dose combinations were well tolerated. AZM/AML combination therapy may offer enhanced BP-lowering efficacy compared with other angiotensin II receptor blocker-based regimens.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291825002851
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.08.003
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Sung Ha(박성하) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-478X
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211198
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links