4 15

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Clinical Outcomes and Future Directions of Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review With Narrative Insights

Authors
 Wang, Ryan  ;  Tamilselvan, Satheeshram  ;  Ha, Ji Soo  ;  Vedantam, Aditya  ;  Goodwin, Courtney Rory  ;  Evaniew, Nathan  ;  Agochukwu, Uzondu F.  ;  Margetis, Konstantinos  ;  Ha, Yoon  ;  Fehlings, Michael  ;  Wilson, Jefferson R.  ;  Mehta, Ankit I. 
Citation
 GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, Vol.16(1_SUPPL) : 15S-27S, 2026-01 
Journal Title
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL
ISSN
 2192-5682 
Issue Date
2026-01
Keywords
endoscopic cervical spine surgery ; minimally invasive spine surgery ; unilateral biportal endoscopy ; endoscopic cervical discectomy ; endoscopic cervical foraminotomy
Abstract
Study DesignSystematic Review.ObjectiveEndoscopic cervical spine surgery (ECSS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open surgery for certain cervical spine disorders. ECSS may offer potential advantages such as reduced tissue trauma, shorter hospital stays, and accelerated functional recovery. Technological advancements have further enhanced its feasibility. The purpose of this article is to review current ECSS approaches, systematically review ECSS for cervical stenosis, and explore future directions of ECSS.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched systematically until October 20, 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. We searched keywords associated with cervical stenosis, including "endoscopic cervical surgery", "endoscopic cervical discectomy", "endoscopic cervical foraminotomy", "cervical endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression", and "unilateral bilateral endoscopy". We excluded duplicate publications, review articles, preprints, and studies without clinical outcomes or incomplete information. Clinical outcomes and complications were collected.ResultsA total of 12 studies were included with 2 studies being reported twice for having two different ECSS approaches. Each study reported postoperative improvement in clinical outcomes compared to preoperative measurements. The most common complications included dural tears, transient hypesthesia, and CSF leakage.ConclusionECSS is an emerging alternative for treating select cases of symptomatic cervical stenosis and other cervical conditions. Complications differed depending on the approach. Advancements in endoscopic instruments, navigational technologies, and artificial intelligence hold promise for improving preoperative planning, surgical precision, and patient outcomes. The true value of ECSS will require carefully conducted prospective, controlled studies with rigorous assessment of outcomes and complications.
Files in This Item:
91379.pdf Download
DOI
10.1177/21925682251369437
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Ha, Yoon(하윤)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/210369
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links