0 21

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Comparative Pain Assessment of Intradermal Versus Subdermal Skin Booster Injections Using PDLLA: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Split-Injection Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYi, Kyuho-
dc.contributor.authorRosellini, Isabella-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Kian Hong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin-Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorSwift, Arthur-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Jong Keun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Han Earl-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Juhyuk-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hongseok-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-29T07:41:23Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-29T07:41:23Z-
dc.date.created2026-01-28-
dc.date.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.issn0364-216X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/210353-
dc.description.abstractBackground Poly-D,L-lactic acid (PDLLA) skin boosters are widely used for biostimulatory skin rejuvenation, but comparative data on pain perception between injection techniques remain limited. Objective To compare patient-reported pain between intradermal and subdermal PDLLA injections using a randomized, double-blinded, split-injection design. Methods Twenty-one healthy participants (aged 27-64) each received ten facial injections: five intradermal and five subdermal, administered in randomized order using a 32G needle. Pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately after each injection. The primary outcome was the difference in mean VAS scores between techniques. Secondary analyses examined the effects of age and gender on pain perception. Results The mean VAS score for intradermal injections was significantly higher than for subdermal injections (6.18 vs. 3.85, p<0.001). No significant gender-based differences were observed. Patients under 40 reported higher intradermal pain than older subjects (p=0.04), but age had no impact on subdermal pain. Conclusion Subdermal PDLLA injections are significantly less painful than intradermal injections, likely due to lower nerve density and reduced dermal resistance. With equivalent efficacy and minimal downtime, subdermal injection may be preferable for patient comfort and compliance.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag-
dc.relation.isPartOfAESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY-
dc.relation.isPartOfAESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY-
dc.titleComparative Pain Assessment of Intradermal Versus Subdermal Skin Booster Injections Using PDLLA: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Split-Injection Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYi, Kyuho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRosellini, Isabella-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLau, Kian Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jin-Hyun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSwift, Arthur-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSong, Jong Keun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Han Earl-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Juhyuk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Hongseok-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00266-025-05596-z-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00050-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-5241-
dc.identifier.pmid41501430-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-05596-z-
dc.subject.keywordPolylactic acid-
dc.subject.keywordInjections, intradermal-
dc.subject.keywordInjections, subcutaneous-
dc.subject.keywordPain measurement-
dc.subject.keywordCosmetic techniques-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYi, Kyuho-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105027191778-
dc.identifier.wosid001655814900001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2026-01-
dc.identifier.rimsid91396-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPolylactic acid-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorInjections, intradermal-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorInjections, subcutaneous-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPain measurement-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCosmetic techniques-
dc.type.docTypeArticle; Early Access-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySurgery-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaSurgery-
dc.identifier.articlenoPMID 7701756-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Oral Biology (구강생물학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.