10 20

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Analysis of experiences on telemedicine pilot projects from the perspectives of doctors, pharmacists, and patients

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJung, Yeryeon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyunah-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jeong-Yeon-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Seongwoo-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Youseok-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Min Jung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hun-Sung-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-28T08:08:22Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-28T08:08:22Z-
dc.date.created2026-01-28-
dc.date.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.issn1226-3303-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/210316-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: This study is the first to analyze telemedicine pilot project experiences from doctors, pharmacists, and patients with different roles to support sustainable commercialization. Methods: An online survey targeted individuals (patients, doctors, and pharmacists) who participated in the telemedicine pilot project at least once between June 1, 2023, and July 17, 2024. The survey assessed satisfaction and usage conditions. The online survey conducted between May 2024 and July 2024 included 1,500 patients, 300 doctors, and 100 pharmacists. Results: Doctors, pharmacists, and patients all expressed their intention to participate actively in telemedicine in the future; however, pharmacists showed lower participation rates than doctors (84.7% vs. 67.0% vs. 91.7%, p < 0.001). The most common reason among doctors was "increasing demands from patients" (44.3%), while for pharmacists, it was "easy management of patients with chronic diseases" (67.0%). This showed a statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.001). Among patients, 65.0% cited "lack of time and convenience." Notably, both doctors and patients agreed that telemedicine requires more time than current practices, although their perceptions differed significantly (all p < 0.001). Additionally, 24.0% of patients who used telemedicine for "hair loss/beauty" purposes reported treatment times of "<= 3 minutes" shorter than for other purposes. Regarding telemedicine platforms, 75.0% of doctors and 84.0% of pharmacists reported no prior experience using them. Conclusions: Appropriate telemedicine systems require collaboration among doctors, pharmacists, and patients. While most groups expressed positive attitudes and future intentions, significant gaps in experience and understanding must be addressed to ensure successful implementation.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKorean Association of Internal Medicine-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-
dc.relation.isPartOfKOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAttitude of Health Personnel*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPatient Satisfaction-
dc.subject.MESHPharmacists* / psychology-
dc.subject.MESHPhysicians* / psychology-
dc.subject.MESHPilot Projects-
dc.subject.MESHSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.subject.MESHTelemedicine*-
dc.titleAnalysis of experiences on telemedicine pilot projects from the perspectives of doctors, pharmacists, and patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung, Yeryeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Hyunah-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jeong-Yeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeo, Seongwoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Youseok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKo, Min Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Hun-Sung-
dc.identifier.doi10.3904/kjim.2025.048-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02883-
dc.identifier.eissn2005-6648-
dc.identifier.pmid41531221-
dc.subject.keywordSurveys and questionnaires-
dc.subject.keywordTelemedicine-
dc.subject.keywordPatient satisfaction-
dc.subject.keywordPharmacists-
dc.subject.keywordPhysicians-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Youseok-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105027348613-
dc.identifier.wosid001655802100014-
dc.citation.volume41-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage131-
dc.citation.endPage142-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, Vol.41(1) : 131-142, 2026-01-
dc.identifier.rimsid91411-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSurveys and questionnaires-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTelemedicine-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPatient satisfaction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPharmacists-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPhysicians-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMedicine, General & Internal-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGeneral & Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:
4. Graduate School of Public Health (보건대학원) > Graduate School of Public Health (보건대학원) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.