2 16

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Target-Controlled Infusion with PSI- and ANI-Guided Sufentanil Versus Remifentanil in Remimazolam-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery After Laparoscopic Subtotal Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJun, Byongnam-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Young Chul-
dc.contributor.authorBai, Sun Joon-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Hye Jung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jinmok-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Na Young-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Jiae-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-22T02:30:55Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-22T02:30:55Z-
dc.date.created2026-01-16-
dc.date.issued2025-12-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/210143-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Target-controlled infusion (TCI) with remifentanil or sufentanil provides stable and effective anesthesia. This randomized prospective trial investigated the comparative efficacy of TCI using sufentanil versus remifentanil on postoperative analgesia and recovery profiles in patients after laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy under remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Methods: Sixty-six patients who underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either TCI-based sufentanil or remifentanil in TIVA with remimazolam. The primary endpoint was the cumulative fentanyl consumption within 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were pain intensity at rest and during activity, and recovery parameters including time to extubation, length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and quality of recovery (QoR-40) on postoperative day 1 (POD1). Results: The cumulative fentanyl consumption over the 24 h postoperative period was similar between the two groups. However, compared with the remifentanil group, the sufentanil group required significantly less fentanyl during the immediate postoperative period (0-0.5 h) (p < 0.001) and exhibited lower pain scores both at rest and during activity during the first postoperative hour (p < 0.001). Although the Sedation-Agitation Scale score at PACU admission was significantly lower in the sufentanil group (p < 0.001), the overall recovery profiles, including time to extubation, PACU stay, and QoR-40 scores on POD 1, were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: TCI-based sufentanil and remifentanil in TIVA with remimazolam showed similar overall analgesic efficacies and recovery outcomes after laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy. Both opioid strategies are effective for postoperative pain management, with a slight advantage in immediate postoperative pain control for sufentanil.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE-
dc.titleTarget-Controlled Infusion with PSI- and ANI-Guided Sufentanil Versus Remifentanil in Remimazolam-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery After Laparoscopic Subtotal Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun, Byongnam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoo, Young Chul-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBai, Sun Joon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShin, Hye Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jinmok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Na Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon, Jiae-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm14248921-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03556-
dc.identifier.eissn2077-0383-
dc.identifier.pmid41464823-
dc.subject.keywordtarget-controlled infusion-
dc.subject.keywordremimazolam-
dc.subject.keywordremifentanil-
dc.subject.keywordsufentanil-
dc.subject.keywordopioid consumption-
dc.subject.keywordanalgesia-
dc.subject.keywordquality of recovery-40-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJun, Byongnam-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYoo, Young Chul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Hye Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jinmok-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Na Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorMoon, Jiae-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105026035309-
dc.identifier.wosid001648345700001-
dc.citation.volume14-
dc.citation.number24-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, Vol.14(24), 2025-12-
dc.identifier.rimsid91036-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortarget-controlled infusion-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorremimazolam-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorremifentanil-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsufentanil-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoropioid consumption-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoranalgesia-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorquality of recovery-40-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDOUBLE-BLIND-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHARMACOKINETICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROPOFOL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSURGERY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPAIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHARMACODYNAMICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFENTANYL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTIME-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTCI-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMedicine, General & Internal-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGeneral & Internal Medicine-
dc.identifier.articleno8921-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.