0 1

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Aquablation versus HoLEP: Propensity score matching analysis of functional outcomes and ejaculation preservation

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김장환-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-02T06:35:09Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-02T06:35:09Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-
dc.identifier.issn2466-0493-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209252-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of Aquablation and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), with emphasis on functional improvement, ejaculatory preservation, and perioperative safety. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from January 2023 to March 2024, excluding patients with follow-up shorter than 3 months. Propensity score matching was performed using age, prostate volume, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Pre- and postoperative outcomes included International Prostate Symptom Score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), PSA, and MSHQ-EjD (Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction)-based ejaculatory grading (0-3). Paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, McNemar's test, and Mann-Whitney U test were applied as appropriate. Results: A total of 104 patients were included, with 34 matched pairs. Both procedures significantly improved lower urinary tract symptoms, with no significant differences in symptom score changes or PVR. HoLEP resulted in greater improvements in Qmax and PSA (p=0.011 and p<0.001, respectively). Aquablation demonstrated significantly better preservation of ejaculation (p=0.002). Although transient incontinence was more frequent in HoLEP and gross hematuria and urinary retention were more common in Aquablation, none of the complication rates showed statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Aquablation and HoLEP are both effective surgical options for BPH. Aquablation offers comparable symptom relief with significantly superior ejaculation preservation, making it particularly suitable for sexually active patients. HoLEP provides greater deobstructive efficacy, as evidenced by superior Qmax and PSA outcomes. These findings support individualized, patient-centered decision-making.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKorean Urological Association-
dc.relation.isPartOfINVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAblation Techniques* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAquablation-
dc.subject.MESHEjaculation*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaser Therapy* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHLasers, Solid-State* / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPropensity Score-
dc.subject.MESHProstatectomy* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Hyperplasia* / complications-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Hyperplasia* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHWater-
dc.titleAquablation versus HoLEP: Propensity score matching analysis of functional outcomes and ejaculation preservation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung Tak Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJang Hwan Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.4111/icu.20250055-
dc.contributor.localIdA00855-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01185-
dc.identifier.eissn2466-054X-
dc.identifier.pmid40897661-
dc.subject.keywordAquablation-
dc.subject.keywordBenign prostatic hyperplasia-
dc.subject.keywordTransurethral resection of prostate-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jang Hwan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김장환-
dc.citation.volume66-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage431-
dc.citation.endPage438-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationINVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, Vol.66(5) : 431-438, 2025-09-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.