7 22

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Establishing consensus recommendations for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in South Korea: A modified Delphi study

Authors
 Jae Young Joung  ;  In Gab Jeong  ;  Sung Gu Kang  ;  Young Hwii Ko  ;  Kyo Chul Koo  ;  Kwang Hyun Kim  ;  Myung Ki Kim  ;  Soodong Kim  ;  Jeong Hyun Kim  ;  Sung-Woo Park  ;  Jae Young Park  ;  Wan Song  ;  Seung Hwan Lee  ;  Seung Il Jung  ;  Jae Hoon Chung  ;  Chang Wook Jeong  ;  Kwan Joong Joo  ;  Seock Hwan Choi  ;  Se Young Choi  ;  Seol Ho Choo  ;  Hong Koo Ha  ;  Sung Kyu Hong  ;  Sung-Hoo Hong  ;  Jeong Hee Hong  ;  Jun Hyuk Hong  ;  Sun Il Kim  ;  Cheol Kwak  ;  Seong Soo Jeon 
Citation
 INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, Vol.66(5) : 416-430, 2025-09 
Journal Title
INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY
ISSN
 2466-0493 
Issue Date
2025-09
MeSH
Androgen Antagonists* / therapeutic use ; Androgen Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use ; Consensus ; Delphi Technique ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Prostatic Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms* / pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms* / therapy ; Republic of Korea
Keywords
Consensus development ; Evidence-based practice ; Prostate cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Consensus is lacking among South Korean urologists on the appropriate treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). A modified, Delphi-based consensus on managing mHSPC patients was developed to support clinical decision-making.

Materials and methods: Thirty-six questions on mHSPC treatment were developed by an expert committee (five urologists). Nine questions required achievement of consensus (key questions). Twenty-three urologists participated in two rounds of a Delphi survey. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement among panelists, with ≥90% agreement representing strong consensus.

Results: Eighteen questions (50.0%) reached strong consensus, 15 (41.7%) reached consensus, and three (8.3%) reached no consensus. Eight key questions (88.9%) reached strong consensus and one (11.1%) reached consensus. Consensus was reached on recommending androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification, irrespective of disease volume or type, with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) as the preferred option. Not using docetaxel alone with ADT when an ARPI is available for treatment intensification was recommended (strong consensus). For high-volume mHSPC patients with a pathogenic, speckle-type poxvirus and zinc finger protein mutation, ADT+ARPI was recommended over triplet therapy (strong consensus). Panelists recommended regular imaging every 6-12 months if no ARPI reimbursement restrictions exist, but a 3-month interval (per current reimbursement guidelines) otherwise. ADT+ARPI was the most recommended systemic treatment (strong consensus).

Conclusions: This Delphi consensus established local consensus on controversial areas of mHSPC management. The findings offer meaningful perspectives that may help shape future treatment strategies and encourage thoughtful reconsideration of reimbursement criteria to align evidence and clinical practice in South Korea.
Files in This Item:
T202506851.pdf Download
DOI
10.4111/icu.20250147
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Koo, Kyo Chul(구교철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7303-6256
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209155
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links