0 62

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Validation of Intravascular Ultrasound- Defined Optimal Stent Expansion Criteria for Favorable 1-Year Clinical Outcomes

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang-Hyup-
dc.contributor.authorJin, Xiaoping-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yong-Joon-
dc.contributor.authorKan, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorGe, Zhen-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung-Jun-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Sung-Jin-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Chul-Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung-Sun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Byeong-Keuk-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Young-Guk-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Donghoon-
dc.contributor.authorJang, Yangsoo-
dc.contributor.authorStone, Gregg W.-
dc.contributor.authorMintz, Gary S.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Shao-Liang-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Myeong-Ki-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-02T06:08:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-02T06:08:34Z-
dc.date.created2025-11-21-
dc.date.issued2025-09-
dc.identifier.issn1936-8798-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209129-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Robust evidence on optimal stent expansion using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is still lacking. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to validate the impact of different criteria for IVUS-defined optimal stent expansion on 1-year clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS Individual patient data from 3 randomized trials were aggregated for this analysis. Patients (n = 6,290) were classified into 3 groups: optimized PCI by IVUS, nonoptimized PCI by IVUS, and angiography-guided PCI. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. RESULTS Angiography-guided PCI was performed in 3,208 patients. Optimal stent expansion was evaluated in 3,082 patients with IVUS-guided PCI. For the absolute criterion of minimal stent area (MSA) >5.5 mm2 indicating optimal stent expansion, the optimized PCI group had a lower incidence of TVF (1.45% vs 3.86% vs 5.07%) compared with the nonoptimized PCI group (adjusted HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.26-0.75; P = 0.002) and the angiography-guided PCI group (adjusted HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.22-0.54; P < 0.001). Relative criteria did not show a significantly different TVF incidence between the optimized and nonoptimized PCI groups. In particular, the absolute criterion of MSA >5.5 mm2 was associated with a significant reduction of the composite of cardiac death or target vessel myocardial infarction (0.54% in the optimized PCI group vs 1.59% in the nonoptimized PCI group; adjusted HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17-0.91; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS Post-PCI stent expansion meeting an absolute criterion of MSA >5.5 mm2 was associated with the most favorable clinical outcomes. (Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of IVUS-XPL, ULTIMATE and IVUS-ACS Randomized Trials; CRD42024559794) (JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18:2197-2205) (c) 2025 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfJACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS-
dc.relation.isPartOfJACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Angiography-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease* / mortality-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease* / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPercutaneous Coronary Intervention* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHPercutaneous Coronary Intervention* / instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHPercutaneous Coronary Intervention* / mortality-
dc.subject.MESHPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.MESHProsthesis Design-
dc.subject.MESHRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHStents*-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Interventional*-
dc.titleValidation of Intravascular Ultrasound- Defined Optimal Stent Expansion Criteria for Favorable 1-Year Clinical Outcomes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Sang-Hyup-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin, Xiaoping-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Yong-Joon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKan, Jing-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGe, Zhen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Seung-Jun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Sung-Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAhn, Chul-Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jung-Sun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Byeong-Keuk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKo, Young-Guk-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Donghoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJang, Yangsoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorStone, Gregg W.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMintz, Gary S.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChen, Shao-Liang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong, Myeong-Ki-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcin.2025.07.024-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01193-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-7605-
dc.identifier.pmid40992799-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879825019326-
dc.subject.keywordangiography-
dc.subject.keywordstent(s)-
dc.subject.keywordultrasound-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Sang-Hyup-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Yong-Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Seung-Jun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Sung-Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorAhn, Chul-Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jung-Sun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Byeong-Keuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKo, Young-Guk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Donghoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Myeong-Ki-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105015674593-
dc.identifier.wosid001580249700001-
dc.citation.volume18-
dc.citation.number18-
dc.citation.startPage2197-
dc.citation.endPage2205-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Vol.18(18) : 2197-2205, 2025-09-
dc.identifier.rimsid90126-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorangiography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorstent(s)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorultrasound-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTERVENTION-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryCardiac & Cardiovascular Systems-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaCardiovascular System & Cardiology-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.