2 12

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Soo In-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jong Wook-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Kee Wook-
dc.contributor.authorCha, Boram-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ga Hee-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Myeongsook-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Han Hee-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ju Yup-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seung Young-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Seon-Young-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Yu Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorSohn, Chong Il-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Suck Chei-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-21T02:59:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-21T02:59:14Z-
dc.date.created2025-11-21-
dc.date.issued2025-07-
dc.identifier.issn2093-0879-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209113-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims The Chicago classification version 4.0 (CC v4.0) proposes a standardized high-resolution manometry protocol for more sophisticated diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. We aim to investigate the real-world application of CC v4.0 through multi-institutional surveys in Asian countries. Methods We requested a total of 161 questionnaires from members of the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association via Google Survey from March to June 2023. The questionnaire assessed CC v4.0 protocol compliance and diagnosis. Results Responses were received from 33 centers in 9 countries (18 in Korea, 5 in Japan, and 10 in others). Among these, anticholinergics were investigated in 14 centers (42.4%), and narcotic drugs in 16 centers (48.5%). Eight centers (24.2%) fully adhered to CC v4.0 protocol for single wet swallows and provocation tests. Nine centers (27.3%) had an adaptation period < 60 seconds, 13 centers (39.4%) had < 3 breath counts, and 15 centers (45.5%) had swallowing intervals < 30 seconds (42.4% had 10-29 seconds and 3% had < 10 seconds). Twenty-four centers (72.7%) started the examination in a supine position and 13 centers (39.4%) did not change their position. Among 27 centers (81.8%) applying provocation tests, all applied multiple rapid swallows, whereas rapid drink challenge was applied in 19 (57.6%). Timed barium esophagography and functional lumen imaging probe were available in 16 (48.5%) and 6 centers (18.2%), respectively. Conclusions We observed heterogeneity among centers in the application of CC v4.0 protocol. To increase inter-center reliability and minimize diagnostic ambiguity, efforts should continue toward the practical clinical application of standard protocols. (J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2025;31:357-365)-
dc.languageKorean-
dc.publisherKorean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY-
dc.titleReal-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Soo In-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Jong Wook-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung, Kee Wook-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCha, Boram-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Ga Hee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeo, Myeongsook-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Han Hee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Ju Yup-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Seung Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Seon-Young-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCho, Yu Kyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSohn, Chong Il-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Suck Chei-
dc.identifier.doi10.5056/jnm25010-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01623-
dc.identifier.eissn2093-0887-
dc.identifier.pmid40625252-
dc.subject.keywordEsophageal motility disorders-
dc.subject.keywordManometry-
dc.subject.keywordPractice patterns-
dc.subject.keywordphysicians&apos-
dc.subject.keyword-
dc.subject.keywordSurveys and questionnaires-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Ga Hee-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105015810090-
dc.identifier.wosid001578077200002-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage357-
dc.citation.endPage365-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, Vol.31(3) : 357-365, 2025-07-
dc.identifier.rimsid90201-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEsophageal motility disorders-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorManometry-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPractice patterns-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorphysicians&apos-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSurveys and questionnaires-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMOTILITY DISORDERS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMUSCLE THICKNESS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRESSURE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSWALLOWS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBODY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTIME-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART003230979-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryClinical Neurology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaNeurosciences & Neurology-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.