9 32

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scale (VIBe) for hemostasis assessment in lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Authors
 Kim, Namhoo  ;  Park, Sub-Ri  ;  Shin, Jae Won  ;  Kwon, Ji-Won  ;  Park, Si-Young  ;  Park, Jin-Oh  ;  Suk, Kyung-Soo  ;  Moon, Seong-Hwan  ;  Kim, Hak-Sun  ;  Lee, Byung Ho 
Citation
 EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2025-09 
Journal Title
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
ISSN
 0940-6719 
Issue Date
2025-09
Keywords
Lumbar spine ; Spinal fusion ; Intraoperative bleeding ; Hemostasis ; Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scale ; Randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Purpose Intraoperative bleeding remains a major challenge in lumbar spine surgery, with conventional assessment methods lacking standardization. The Validated Intraoperative Bleeding Severity Scale (VIBe) is a structured five-grade tool developed to objectively assess bleeding severity across surgical fields. This study evaluated the clinical utility of VIBe in lumbar spinal fusion by comparing it with conventional bleeding metrics across various hemostatic strategies, including hypotensive anesthesia and local hemostatic agent use. Methods In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 70 patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar decompression and fusion were randomized to normotensive or hypotensive anesthesia. Each group was further divided by hemostatic strategy: active agents alone or a combination of active and passive agents. VIBe grades were independently recorded by the surgeon and assistant for each bleeding site. Conventional bleeding metrics-including estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion volume, and drain output-were also collected. Between group comparisons and inter-rater agreement were assessed, and correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the VIBe and conventional bleeding metrics. Results VIBe grades improved significantly after hemostasis in all patients (p < 0.001). Although intraoperative blood pressures were significantly lower in the hypotensive group, there were no significant differences in transfusion volume, EBL, drain output, or VIBe-based assessments. Outcomes were also comparable between patients receiving combined versus active-only hemostatic agents. Inter-rater agreement for VIBe scores before hemostasis, after hemostasis, and for score changes was near-perfect (kappa = 0.934, 0.834, and 0.856 respectively, all p < 0.001). Operator-assigned VIBe scores significantly correlated with EBL (rho = 0.305, p = 0.010) and transfusion volume (rho = 0.264, p = 0.027); assistant correlated with EBL (rho = 0.284, p = 0.017). Conclusion VIBe is a reliable and reproducible tool for intraoperative bleeding assessment in lumbar spine fusion. Active hemostatic agents were effective, and the addition of passive agents offered no measurable advantage.
Files in This Item:
89978.pdf Download
DOI
10.1007/s00586-025-09328-4
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kwon, Ji-Won(권지원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4880-5310
Kim, Nam-Hoo(김남후)
Kim, Hak Sun(김학선) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-4688
Moon, Seong Hwan(문성환)
Park, Sub-Ri(박섭리) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-9810
Park, Si Young(박시영)
Park, Jin Oh(박진오)
Suk, Kyung Soo(석경수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0633-2658
Shin, Jae Won(신재원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-6336
Lee, Byung Ho(이병호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7235-4981
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/208097
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links