0 9

Cited 1 times in

Cited 0 times in

Clinical outcome and pattern of care for isolated or incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Bo Ra-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Se Ik-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sang Wun-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Chel Hun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shin-Wha-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Myong Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yun Hwan-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-03T00:39:27Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-03T00:39:27Z-
dc.date.created2025-10-29-
dc.date.issued2025-09-
dc.identifier.issn2005-0380-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/208085-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a potential precursor of high-grade serous carcinoma, is associated with subsequent carcinomas development. This study aimed to identify cases of STIC and serous tubal intraepithelial lesions (STIL) and examine clinical outcomes and patterns of care in BRCA1/2 mutations carriers undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), as well as patients with incidental STIC/STIL after benign gynecologic surgery. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at six institutions to examine patients with isolated STIC/STIL. Demographic, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up data were collected from the date of implementation of Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated end protocol, which varied from 2006 to 2015, until December 2022. Results: We analyzed the data of 1,119 women who underwent RRSO and were carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. The detection rate of isolated STIC/STIL was 1.70%. No patient with STIC/STIL received adjuvant chemotherapy or staging operations. The institutions used different surveillance intervals and methods, with the most common being a 3-6 month interval (11 of 19 patients) and gynecological sonography (17 of 19 patients). All patients remained with no evidence of disease (NED) throughout the follow-up period (2-121 months). Additionally, we analyzed data from five women with incidental STIC/ STIL diagnosed after benign gynecological surgery; one woman underwent staging surgery. During the follow-up period (3-46 months), all patients remained in NED. Conclusion: While patient monitoring after STIC/STIL detection may be considered due to the minimal risk of carcinoma, excessive concern may not be necessary. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered only with caution.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAsian Society of Gynecologic Oncology : Taehan Puin Chongyang Hakhoe-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHBRCA1 Protein / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHBRCA2 Protein / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ* / diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ* / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma in Situ* / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHCystadenocarcinoma, Serous* / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHCystadenocarcinoma, Serous* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHCystadenocarcinoma, Serous* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHCystadenocarcinoma, Serous* / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHFallopian Tube Neoplasms* / diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHFallopian Tube Neoplasms* / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHFallopian Tube Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHFallopian Tube Neoplasms* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHFallopian Tube Neoplasms* / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGenes, BRCA1-
dc.subject.MESHGenes, BRCA2-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSalpingo-oophorectomy-
dc.titleClinical outcome and pattern of care for isolated or incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Bo Ra-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Se Ik-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sang Wun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Chel Hun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Shin-Wha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLim, Myong Cheol-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Yun Hwan-
dc.identifier.doi10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e68-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01428-
dc.identifier.eissn2005-0399-
dc.identifier.pmid40017163-
dc.subject.keywordSerous Ovarian Neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordCarcinoma in Situ-
dc.subject.keywordGenes, BRCA1-
dc.subject.keywordGenes, BRCA2-
dc.subject.keywordProphylactic Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.keywordSalpingo-oophorectomy-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Sang Wun-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105015677686-
dc.identifier.wosid001568673200008-
dc.citation.volume36-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, Vol.36(5), 2025-09-
dc.identifier.rimsid90013-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSerous Ovarian Neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCarcinoma in Situ-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGenes, BRCA1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGenes, BRCA2-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorProphylactic Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSalpingo-oophorectomy-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOVARIAN-CANCER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFOLLOW-UP-
dc.subject.keywordPlusWOMEN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIAGNOSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSURGERY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLESIONS-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART003241786-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryOncology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryObstetrics & Gynecology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaOncology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaObstetrics & Gynecology-
dc.identifier.articlenoe68-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.