0 12

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Novel deep learning framework for simultaneous assessment of left ventricular mass and longitudinal strain: clinical feasibility and validation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Authors
 Park, Jiesuck  ;  Yoon, Yeonyee E.  ;  Jang, Yeonggul  ;  Jung, Taekgeun  ;  Jeon, Jaeik  ;  Lee, Seung-Ah  ;  Choi, Hong-Mi  ;  Hwang, In-Chang  ;  Chun, Eun Ju  ;  Cho, Goo-Yeong  ;  Chang, Hyuk-Jae 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, , 2025-07 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
ISSN
 1349-0222 
Issue Date
2025-07
Keywords
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ; Echocardiography ; Global longitudinal strain ; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ; Left ventricle ; Mass
Abstract
BackgroundThis study aims to present the Segmentation-based Myocardial Advanced Refinement Tracking (SMART) system, a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based framework for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) that incorporates motion tracking and left ventricular (LV) myocardial segmentation for automated LV mass (LVM) and global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) assessment.MethodsThe SMART system demonstrates LV speckle tracking based on motion vector estimation, refined by structural information using endocardial and epicardial segmentation throughout the cardiac cycle. This approach enables automated measurement of LVMSMART and LVGLSSMART. The feasibility of SMART is validated in 111 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients (median age: 58 years, 69% male) who underwent TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).ResultsLVGLSSMART showed a strong correlation with conventional manual LVGLS measurements (Pearson's correlation coefficient [PCC] 0.851; mean difference 0 [-2-0]). When compared to CMR as the reference standard for LVM, the conventional dimension-based TTE method overestimated LVM (PCC 0.652; mean difference: 106 [90-123]), whereas LVMSMART demonstrated excellent agreement with CMR (PCC 0.843; mean difference: 1 [-11-13]). For predicting extensive myocardial fibrosis, LVGLSSMART and LVMSMART exhibited performance comparable to conventional LVGLS and CMR (AUC: 0.72 and 0.66, respectively). Patients identified as high risk for extensive fibrosis by LVGLSSMART and LVMSMART had significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes, including heart failure hospitalization, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and defibrillator implantation.ConclusionsThe SMART technique provides a comparable LVGLS evaluation and a more accurate LVM assessment than conventional TTE, with predictive values for myocardial fibrosis and adverse outcomes. These findings support its utility in HCM management.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12574-025-00694-y
DOI
10.1007/s12574-025-00694-y
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Chang, Hyuk-Jae(장혁재) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6139-7545
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/207958
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links