2 5

Cited 0 times in

Impact of Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressure Changes on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Authors
 Jiwon Seo  ;  Ah-Ram Kim  ;  Iksung Cho  ;  Chi Young Shim  ;  Geu-Ru Hong  ;  Eui-Young Choi  ;  Se-Joong Rim  ;  Young-Guk Ko  ;  Myeong-Ki Hong  ;  Jae-Kwan Song  ;  Jong-Won Ha 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, Vol.14(11) : e039372, 2025-06 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
Issue Date
2025-06
MeSH
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Valve Stenosis* / mortality ; Aortic Valve Stenosis* / physiopathology ; Aortic Valve Stenosis* / surgery ; Aortic Valve* / diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve* / physiopathology ; Aortic Valve* / surgery ; Diastole ; Female ; Heart Failure / etiology ; Heart Failure / physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time Factors ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement* / adverse effects ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement* / mortality ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Function, Left* / physiology ; Ventricular Pressure* / physiology
Keywords
aortic stenosis ; diastolic function ; transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Abstract
Changes in left ventricular (LV) diastolic pressure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or their relationship with subsequent outcomes remain poorly clarified. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the changes in invasively measured LV diastolic pressure and their relationship with long-term outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.

Methods: In total, 509 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at 3 tertiary centers were retrospectively included and divided into 2 groups according to changes in LV pre-A pressure after TAVR: Group 1, with no change or decrease in pre-A pressure, and Group 2, presenting an increase in pre-A pressure after TAVR. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and rehospitalization for heart failure.

Results: Group 1 included 39% (n=198) patients, and Group 2 had 61% (n=311) patients. More patients in Group 2 had diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and a larger aortic valve area than in Group 1. During the follow-up period (median, 28 months), 122 primary outcomes were recorded. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome and all-cause death was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2. In multivariable Cox hazard models, Group 1 was independently associated with a favorable primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.34-0.80]; P=0.003).

Conclusions: Increase in LV pre-A pressure after TAVR is common, and no change or decrease in LV pre-A pressure after TAVR is independently associated with favorable outcomes. Changes in LV pre-A pressure can help identify patient subsets who will maximally benefit from TAVR.
Files in This Item:
T202505147.pdf Download
DOI
10.1161/jaha.124.039372
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Ko, Young Guk(고영국) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-5788
Seo, Jiwon(서지원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7641-3739
Shim, Chi Young(심지영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-0136
Rim, Se Joong(임세중) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-5581
Cho, Ik Sung(조익성)
Choi, Eui Young(최의영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-0190
Ha, Jong Won(하종원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-2958
Hong, Geu Ru(홍그루) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-3304
Hong, Myeong Ki(홍명기) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2090-2031
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/207090
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links