Estimated GFR in the Korean and US Asian Populations Using the 2021 Creatinine-Based GFR Estimating Equation Without Race

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: In 2021, the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) updated the creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation and removed the coefficient for race. The development and validation of this equation involved binarizing race into African American and non-African American, involving few Asian participants. This study aimed to examine the difference between the 2021 equation and the previous 2009 equation on CKD prevalence estimates in 2 Asian populations. Study Design: Observational study using 2 national surveys. Setting & Participants: Participants from the 2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Survey and participants self-reported as Asian from the 2011-2020 US National Health and Nutrition Survey. Exposure: eGFR using 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equation. Outcomes: Prevalence of CKD (eGFR<60mL/min/1.73m(2) or urine albumin-creatinine ratio >= 30mg/g). Analytical Approach: Sampling-weighted prevalence estimated using the 2009 and 2021 equations as well as the percentage of individuals with CKD G3+using the 2009 equation being reclassified as not having CKD G3+using the 2021 equation. Results: The prevalence of CKD estimated using the 2021 equation was 9.75% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 8.80-10.80%) in Koreans and 11.60% (95% CI, 10.23-13.13%) in US Asians. The prevalence of CKD estimated using the 2021 equation was slightly lower than that using the 2009 equation in both Korean and US Asian populations by 0.63% (95% CI, 0.44-0.90%) and 0.84% (95% CI, 0.52-1.34%), respectively. Furthermore, 32.8% and 30.2% of Koreans and US Asians with CKD G3-5, respectively, estimated using the 2009 equation were reclassified as not having CKD G3-5 when the eGFR was calculated using the 2021 equation. Limitations: Measured GFR was not available. Conclusions: Use of the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equation leads to a small decrease in CKD prevalence in both Korean and US Asian populations, and of similar magnitude, resulting in significant reclassification among those originally classified as having CKD G3+.