Cited 0 times in

Prediction of final pathology depending on preoperative myometrial invasion and grade assessment in low-risk endometrial cancer patients: A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary study

Authors
 Dong-Hoon Jang  ;  Hyun-Gyu Lee  ;  Banghyun Lee  ;  Sokbom Kang  ;  Jong-Hyeok Kim  ;  Byoung-Gie Kim  ;  Jae-Weon Kim  ;  Moon-Hong Kim  ;  Xiaojun Chen  ;  Jae Hong No  ;  Jong-Min Lee  ;  Jae-Hoon Kim  ;  Hidemich Watari  ;  Seok Mo Kim  ;  Sung Hoon Kim  ;  Seok Ju Seong  ;  Dae Hoon Jeong  ;  Yun Hwan Kim 
Citation
 PLOS ONE, Vol.19(6) : e0305360, 2024-06 
Journal Title
PLOS ONE
Issue Date
2024-06
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid / pathology ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid / surgery ; Endometrial Neoplasms* / pathology ; Endometrial Neoplasms* / surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Middle Aged ; Myometrium* / pathology ; Myometrium* / surgery ; Neoplasm Grading* ; Neoplasm Invasiveness* ; Preoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Republic of Korea / epidemiology
Abstract
Objectives: Fertility-sparing treatment (FST) might be considered an option for reproductive patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (EC). On the other hand, the matching rates between preoperative assessment and postoperative pathology in low-risk EC patients are not high enough. We aimed to predict the postoperative pathology depending on preoperative myometrial invasion (MI) and grade in low-risk EC patients to help extend the current criteria for FST.

Methods/materials: This ancillary study (KGOG 2015S) of Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group 2015, a prospective, multicenter study included patients with no MI or MI <1/2 on preoperative MRI and endometrioid adenocarcinoma and grade 1 or 2 on endometrial biopsy. Among the eligible patients, Groups 1-4 were defined with no MI and grade 1, no MI and grade 2, MI <1/2 and grade 1, and MI <1/2 and grade 2, respectively. New prediction models using machine learning were developed.

Results: Among 251 eligible patients, Groups 1-4 included 106, 41, 74, and 30 patients, respectively. The new prediction models showed superior prediction values to those from conventional analysis. In the new prediction models, the best NPV, sensitivity, and AUC of preoperative each group to predict postoperative each group were as follows: 87.2%, 71.6%, and 0.732 (Group 1); 97.6%, 78.6%, and 0.656 (Group 2); 71.3%, 78.6% and 0.588 (Group 3); 91.8%, 64.9%, and 0.676% (Group 4).

Conclusions: In low-risk EC patients, the prediction of postoperative pathology was ineffective, but the new prediction models provided a better prediction.
Files in This Item:
T202404473.pdf Download
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0305360
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sung Hoon(김성훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-7473
Kim, Jae Hoon(김재훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-7065
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/204481
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links