Cited 0 times in

Continuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author강은석-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-13T17:00:51Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-13T17:00:51Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-
dc.identifier.issn0012-186X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/204295-
dc.description.abstractAims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of stand-alone intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) with or without a structured education programme and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI). Methods: In this 24 week randomised open-label multicentre trial, adults with type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy with HbA1c levels of 58-108 mmol/mol (7.5-12.0%) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to isCGM with a structured education programme on adjusting insulin dose and timing according to graphical patterns in CGM (intervention group), isCGM with conventional education (control group 1) or BGM with conventional education (control group 2). Block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and investigators was not possible. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks, assessed using ANCOVA with the baseline value as a covariate. Results: A total of 159 individuals were randomised (n=53 for each group); 148 were included in the full analysis set, with 52 in the intervention group, 49 in control group 1 and 47 in control group 2. The mean (± SD) HbA1c level at baseline was 68.19±10.94 mmol/mol (8.39±1.00%). The least squares mean change (± SEM) from baseline HbA1c at 24 weeks was -10.96±1.35 mmol/mol (-1.00±0.12%) in the intervention group, -6.87±1.39 mmol/mol (-0.63±0.13%) in control group 1 (p=0.0367 vs intervention group) and -6.32±1.42 mmol/mol (-0.58±0.13%) in control group 2 (p=0.0193 vs intervention group). Adverse events occurred in 28.85% (15/52) of individuals in the intervention group, 26.42% (14/53) in control group 1 and 48.08% (25/52) in control group 2. Conclusions/interpretation: Stand-alone isCGM offers a greater reduction in HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes on MDI when education on the interpretation of graphical patterns in CGM is provided. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04926623. Funding: This study was supported by Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag-
dc.relation.isPartOfDIABETOLOGIA-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Glucose Self-Monitoring* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Glucose* / drug effects-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Glucose* / metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHContinuous Glucose Monitoring-
dc.subject.MESHDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / blood-
dc.subject.MESHDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGlycated Hemoglobin* / analysis-
dc.subject.MESHGlycated Hemoglobin* / metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHHypoglycemic Agents* / administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHHypoglycemic Agents* / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHInsulin* / administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHInsulin* / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPatient Education as Topic* / methods-
dc.titleContinuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Yoon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Man Jin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKang Hee Sim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBo-Yeon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Hyoung Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun Sung Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoo Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Seok Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCheol-Young Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSin Gon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Hyeon Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00125-024-06152-1-
dc.contributor.localIdA00068-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00727-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-0428-
dc.identifier.pmid38639876-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-024-06152-1-
dc.subject.keywordContinuous glucose monitoring-
dc.subject.keywordDiabetes education-
dc.subject.keywordFlash sensor glucose technology-
dc.subject.keywordInsulin-
dc.subject.keywordType 2 diabetes-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKang, Eun Seok-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor강은석-
dc.citation.volume67-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.citation.startPage1223-
dc.citation.endPage1234-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationDIABETOLOGIA, Vol.67(7) : 1223-1234, 2024-07-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.