Cited 2 times in

Health-related quality-of-life analysis from KEYNOTE-590: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer

Authors
 Wasat Mansoor  ;  Seongjung Joo  ;  Josephine M Norquist  ;  Ken Kato  ;  Jong-Mu Sun  ;  Manish A Shah  ;  Peter Enzinger  ;  Antoine Adenis  ;  Toshihiko Doi  ;  Takashi Kojima  ;  Jean-Philippe Metges  ;  Zhigang Li  ;  Sung-Bae Kim  ;  Byoung Chol Cho  ;  Patrapim Sunpaweravong  ;  Maria Alsina  ;  Eray Goekkurt  ;  Shailaja Suryawanshi  ;  Sukrut Shah  ;  Lin Shen 
Citation
 ONCOLOGIST, Vol.29(10) : e1324-e1335, 2024-10 
Journal Title
ONCOLOGIST
ISSN
 1083-7159 
Issue Date
2024-10
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized* / administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized* / adverse effects ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized* / therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols* / adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols* / therapeutic use ; Esophageal Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms* / pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms* / psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Quality of Life* ; Surveys and Questionnaires
Keywords
chemotherapy ; esophageal cancer ; esophagogastric junction cancer ; health-related quality of life ; pembrolizumab
Abstract
Background: In the KEYNOTE-590 study, first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provided statistically significant improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate compared with chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes are reported.

Materials and methods: Change from baseline to week 18 in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status/QoL (GHS/QoL) and QLQ-Esophageal cancer module (OES18) dysphagia, pain, and reflux scales were evaluated.

Results: The HRQoL analysis included 730 patients who received treatment and completed ≥1 HRQoL assessment. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 18 was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 reflux scales. The QLQ-OES18 dysphagia (LSM difference, -5.54; 95% CI, -10.93 to -0.16) and pain (LSM difference, -2.94; 95% CI, -5.86 to -0.02) scales favored pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy over placebo plus chemotherapy. Median time to confirmed deterioration (TTD) was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 dysphagia and reflux scales. Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged median TTD, as seen on the QLQ-OES18 pain scale (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95).

Conclusion: The use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy maintained HRQoL at week 18 relative to baseline and was comparable with placebo plus chemotherapy. These HRQoL results together with published reports of efficacy, support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer.

Clinicaltrials.gov id: NCT03189719.
Files in This Item:
T992024687.pdf Download
DOI
10.1093/oncolo/oyae087
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cho, Byoung Chul(조병철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-270X
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/202311
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links