Patient-reported outcomes in CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation
Authors
David M Waterhouse ; Sacha Rothschild ; Christophe Dooms ; Bertrand Mennecier ; Farastuk Bozorgmehr ; Margarita Majem ; Michel H van den Heuvel ; Helena Linardou ; Byoung Chul Cho ; Rachel Roberts-Thomson ; Kentaro Tanaka ; Normand Blais ; Gustavo Schvartsman ; Karin Holmskov Hansen ; Izabela Chmielewska ; Martin D Forster ; Christina Giannopoulou ; Björn Stollenwerk ; Cynthia C Obiozor ; Yang Wang ; Silvia Novello
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / genetics ; Docetaxel* / therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Lung Neoplasms* / genetics ; Lung Neoplasms* / pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation* ; Neoplasm Staging ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures* ; Piperazines ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)* / genetics ; Pyridines ; Pyrimidines / therapeutic use ; Quality of Life* ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Quality of life ; Side effects ; Symptom burden
Abstract
Background: In the CodeBreaK 200 phase III, open-label trial, sotorasib significantly improved efficacy versus docetaxel in previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for global health status, physical functioning, dyspnea, and cough favored sotorasib over docetaxel. Here, we report sotorasib's additional impact on quality of life (QOL).
Methods: In CodeBreaK 200, 345 patients who had progressed after prior therapy received sotorasib (960 mg orally daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks). Validated questionnaires captured patients' perception of their QOL and symptom burden for key secondary and exploratory PRO endpoints, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13), question GP5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Tool General Form (FACT-G GP5), PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and 5-level EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) including visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Change from baseline to week 12 was assessed with generalized estimating equations for ordinal outcomes.
Results: Patients receiving sotorasib were less bothered by treatment side effects than those receiving docetaxel (odds ratio [OR] 5.7) and experienced symptoms at lower severity (pain: OR 2.9; aching muscles: OR 4.4; aching joints: OR 4.2; mouth or throat sores: OR 4.3). Further, patients' symptoms interfered less with usual/daily activities (pain: OR 3.2; aching muscles: OR 3.9; aching joints: OR 10.7). QOL remained stable with sotorasib but worsened with docetaxel (change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score: 1.5 vs -8.4 at cycle 1 day 5 and 2.2 vs -5.8 at week 12).
Conclusions: Patients receiving sotorasib reported less severe symptoms than those receiving docetaxel. In addition to improving clinical efficacy outcomes, sotorasib maintained QOL versus docetaxel, suggesting sotorasib may be a more tolerable treatment option for patients with pretreated, KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.