0 87

Cited 0 times in

Cited 26 times in

Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Limited Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: An International Multicenter Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author최기홍-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-03T08:46:36Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-03T08:46:36Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201849-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic limited liver resections (RLLR) versus laparoscopic limited liver resections (LLLR) of the posterosuperior segments. Background: Both laparoscopic and robotic liver resections have been used for tumors in the posterosuperior liver segments. However, the comparative performance and safety of both approaches have not been well examined in the existing literature. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 5446 patients who underwent RLLR or LLLR of the posterosuperior segments (I, IVa, VII, and VIII) at 60 international centers between 2008 and 2021. Data on baseline demographics, center experience and volume, tumor features, and perioperative characteristics were collected and analyzed. Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis (in both 1:1 and 1:2 ratios) was performed to minimize selection bias. Results: A total of 3510 cases met the study criteria, of whom 3049 underwent LLLR (87%), and 461 underwent RLLR (13%). After PSM (1:1: and 1:2), RLLR was associated with a lower open conversion rate [10 of 449 (2.2%) vs 54 of 898 (6.0%); P =0.002], less blood loss [100 mL [IQR: 50-200) days vs 150 mL (IQR: 50-350); P <0.001] and a shorter operative time (188 min (IQR: 140-270) vs 222 min (IQR: 158-300); P <0.001]. These improved perioperative outcomes associated with RLLR were similarly seen in a subset analysis of patients with cirrhosis-lower open conversion rate [1 of 136 (0.7%) vs 17 of 272 (6.2%); P =0.009], less blood loss [100 mL (IQR: 48-200) vs 160 mL (IQR: 50-400); P <0.001], and shorter operative time [190 min (IQR: 141-258) vs 230 min (IQR: 160-312); P =0.003]. Postoperative outcomes in terms of readmission, morbidity and mortality were similar between RLLR and LLLR in both the overall PSM cohort and cirrhosis patient subset. Conclusions: RLLR for the posterosuperior segments was associated with superior perioperative outcomes in terms of decreased operative time, blood loss, and open conversion rate when compared with LLLR.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relation.isPartOfANNALS OF SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHHepatectomy-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy*-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Cirrhosis / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications / epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHPropensity Score-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRobotic Surgical Procedures*-
dc.titlePropensity Score-Matching Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Limited Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: An International Multicenter Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFelix Krenzien-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoritz Schmelzle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJohann Pratschke-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLinda Feldbrügge-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRong Liu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorQu Liu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWanguang Zhang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoseph J Zhao-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHwee-Leong Tan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFederica Cipriani-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTijs J Hoogteijling-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDavit L Aghayan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorÅsmund A Fretland-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTiing Foong Siow-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChetana Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOlivier Scatton-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPaulo Herman-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFabricio F Coelho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMarco V Marino 11-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVincenzo Mazzaferro-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAdrian K H Chiow-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIswanto Sucandy-
dc.contributor.googleauthorArpad Ivanecz-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hoon Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Hoon Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMikel Gastaca-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMarco Vivarelli-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFelice Giuliante-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBernardo Dalla Valle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAndrea Ruzzenente-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChee-Chien Yong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorZewei Chen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMengqiu Yin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorConstantino Fondevila-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMikhail Efanov-
dc.contributor.googleauthorZenichi Morise-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFabrizio Di Benedetto-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRaffaele Brustia-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRaffaele Dalla Valle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorUgo Boggi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDavid Geller-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAndrea Belli-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRiccardo Memeo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSalvatore Gruttadauria-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAlejandro Mejia-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJames O Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFernando Rotellar-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGi-Hong Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRicardo Robles-Campos-
dc.contributor.googleauthorXiaoying Wang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRobert P Sutcliffe-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKiyoshi Hasegawa-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung-Ngai Tang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCharing C N Chong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKit-Fai Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJuul Meurs-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMathieu D'Hondt-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKazuteru Monden-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSantiago Lopez-Ben-
dc.contributor.googleauthorT Peter Kingham-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAlessandro Ferrero-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiuseppe M Ettorre-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFranco Pascual-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDaniel Cherqui-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJunhao Zheng-
dc.contributor.googleauthorXiao Liang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOlivier Soubrane-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGo Wakabayashi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRoberto I Troisi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTan-To Cheung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYutaro Kato-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAtsushi Sugioka-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSafi Dokmak-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMizelle D'Silva-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHo-Seong Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPhan Phuoc Nghia-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTran Cong Duy Long-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMohammad Abu Hilal-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKuo-Hsin Chen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDavid Fuks-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLuca Aldrighetti-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBjørn Edwin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBrian K P Goh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorInternational robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SLA.0000000000006027-
dc.contributor.localIdA04046-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00178-
dc.identifier.eissn1528-1140 (-
dc.identifier.pmid37485989-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/fulltext/2024/02000/propensity_score_matching_analysis_comparing.15.aspx-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Gi Hong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최기홍-
dc.citation.volume279-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage297-
dc.citation.endPage305-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANNALS OF SURGERY, Vol.279(2) : 297-305, 2024-02-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.