0 60

Cited 0 times in

Cited 2 times in

Treatment Patterns and Prognosis of Palliative Chemotherapy Combined With Targeting Agents in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: CHOICE, A Multicenter Longitudinal Observational Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author신상준-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-03T08:46:17Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-03T08:46:17Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-
dc.identifier.issn0250-7005-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201843-
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: This study investigated the treatment patterns and prognosis of patients with metastatic or unresectable colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with chemotherapy with targeting agents. Patients and methods: This longitudinal multicenter study included 963 patients with mCRC who were treated in Korea between 2016 and 2020. Treatment patterns and efficacy were compared according to the mutation status and clinical factors. Results: As first-line therapy, most of the patients (83.5%) received FOLFOX plus bevacizumab (35.4%), followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (18.8%), FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (17.0%), and FOLFOX plus cetuximab (12.3%). Bevacizumab was the most frequent agent (78.8%) combined with chemotherapy in RAS-mutated CRC, while cetuximab (57.2%) in RAS wild-type CRC. Cetuximab was frequently combined with a doublet regimen in patients with left-sided CRC than in those with right-sided CRC (34.4% vs. 16%). As second-line therapy, most patients (63.4%) also received doublet regimens with bevacizumab, and FOLFIRI plus aflibercept was administered in 15.1%. The objective response rate with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab was significantly higher in patients with left-sided CRC than in those with right-sided CRC (59.2% vs. 30.8%, p=0.008) and marginally higher in patients with RAS wild-type CRC than in those with RAS-mutated CRC (55.6% vs. 0.0%, p=0.092). Progression-free survival (PFS) with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab was significantly shorter than that with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (p=0.030) in RAS-mutated CRC, whereas there were no significant differences between regimens in RAS wild-type CRC. Conclusion: In patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, doublet chemotherapy with targeting agents is the most common therapy and efficacy depends on the mutation status as well as clinical factors.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherInternational Institute of Anticancer Research-
dc.relation.isPartOfANTICANCER RESEARCH-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHBevacizumab / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCetuximab-
dc.subject.MESHColonic Neoplasms* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHColorectal Neoplasms* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHColorectal Neoplasms* / genetics-
dc.subject.MESHColorectal Neoplasms* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHRectal Neoplasms* / drug therapy-
dc.titleTreatment Patterns and Prognosis of Palliative Chemotherapy Combined With Targeting Agents in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: CHOICE, A Multicenter Longitudinal Observational Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJwa Hoon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYongjun Cha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Joon Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Suk Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Hun Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChan Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hee Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyoung Joo Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Gwang Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Gyu Hwang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong-Kwon Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong Hoon Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeok Yun Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Cheol Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Taek Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Sun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHei-Cheul Jeung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyoung Hee Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Sil Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye Won Ryu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung Hee Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon Hee Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Young Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Hyun Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSo-Yeon Jeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNamsu Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChi-Young Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeul Hong Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.21873/anticanres.16818-
dc.contributor.localIdA02105-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00188-
dc.identifier.eissn1791-7530-
dc.identifier.pmid38160001-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/44/1/347.long-
dc.subject.keywordColorectal cancer-
dc.subject.keywordefficacy-
dc.subject.keywordmutation status-
dc.subject.keywordprimary tumor location-
dc.subject.keywordtreatment patterns-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Sang Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor신상준-
dc.citation.volume44-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage347-
dc.citation.endPage359-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANTICANCER RESEARCH, Vol.44(1) : 347-359, 2024-01-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.