Cited 0 times in

Artisential®-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparative analysis with Robot(Da Vinci®)-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author강창무-
dc.contributor.author김성현-
dc.contributor.author노승윤-
dc.contributor.author최문석-
dc.contributor.author홍승수-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-03T08:10:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-03T08:10:54Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.issn1365-182X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201582-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (R-PD) helps further improve the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, it faces challenges such as high costs and limitations in availability at different centers, making it difficult for patients to access. In this study, we evaluate the initial experience of Artisential®-assisted PD (A-PD) and compare its perioperative outcomes with R-PD, discussing the clinical applicability of A-PD. Methods: This study reviewed cases of R-PD and A-PD conducted between 2022 and 2023. A total of 34 patients underwent R-PD, while 26 patients underwent A-PD. Statistical analysis was conducted based on factors related to the patient's surgical procedure and postoperative prognostic indicators. Results: There were no significant differences observed between the two groups in terms of surgical factors. There were also no differences in the occurrence of postoperative complications. However, there was a significant difference in the length of hospital stay, with the Artisential® group having an average of 11.50 ± 5.54 days and the Robot group having 15.06 ± 5.34 days (p = 0.001). Conclusions: R-PD and A-PD showed no differences in procedures or outcomes. Using a multi-articulated device is beneficial where robot use is challenging.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfHPB-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPancreatic Neoplasms / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHPancreaticoduodenectomy* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHPancreaticoduodenectomy* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications* / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRobotic Surgical Procedures* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHRobotic Surgical Procedures* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleArtisential®-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparative analysis with Robot(Da Vinci®)-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSu Hyeong Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeoung Yoon Rho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMunseok Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Soo Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Moo Kang-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.006-
dc.contributor.localIdA00088-
dc.contributor.localIdA04529-
dc.contributor.localIdA05469-
dc.contributor.localIdA05885-
dc.contributor.localIdA05072-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03345-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-2574-
dc.identifier.pmid39341775-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S1365182X24023220-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKang, Chang Moo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor강창무-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김성현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor노승윤-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최문석-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor홍승수-
dc.citation.volume26-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage1477-
dc.citation.endPage1486-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHPB, Vol.26(12) : 1477-1486, 2024-12-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.