Cited 0 times in
Cited 0 times in
Humeral stem alignment of curved short stem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Varus/Valgus alignment is not a determinant for clinical outcomes
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 윤태환 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 천용민 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이용준 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 장선호 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 임준열 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-06T03:36:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-06T03:36:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1058-2746 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/201181 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: This study aimed to investigate the influence of curved short stem alignment within the proximal humerus on the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the varus/valgus alignment would yield clinical outcomes comparable to those of a neutral alignment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 167 patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the Aequalis Ascend Flex implant between January 2017 and December 2021. The study categorized the patients into three groups based on the angle difference between the humeral axis and the stem axis: neutral group (GN, defined as within ±5 degrees), valgus group (GL), and varus group (GR). Functional outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale pain score, subjective shoulder value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder score, and active range of motion. Routine radiographic evaluations were also conducted to assess the filling ratio and bone resorption. Results: Among 138 patients, 89 were in the GN group, 37 (27%) in the GL group, and 12 (9%) in the GR group. The average degree of varus alignment was 6 (range from 5 to 7 degrees), while the average degree of valgus alignment was -7 (range from -8 to -5 degrees). According to our findings, the clinical outcomes did not exhibit significant differences between the three groups. Furthermore, the radiological outcomes showed no significant differences among the three groups. Conclusions: Compared to neutral alignment, varus or valgus alignment of the humeral stem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a curved short stem does not significantly affect clinical outcomes. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | restriction | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | Mosby | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.title | Humeral stem alignment of curved short stem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Varus/Valgus alignment is not a determinant for clinical outcomes | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine (의과대학) | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Yong-Jun Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Hsien-Hao Chang | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Joon-Ryul Lim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Tae-Hwan Yoon | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Yong-Min Chun | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.022 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A05488 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A04028 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A05495 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J01748 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1532-6500 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 39393675 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274624007201 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Curved short stem | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Humeral stem alignment | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Range of motion | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Reverse shoulder arthroplasty | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Valgus | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Varus | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Yoon, Tae Hwan | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 윤태환 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 천용민 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이용준 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 34 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1166 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1172 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, Vol.34(5) : 1166-1172, 2025-03 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.