0 29

Cited 0 times in

Comparison of the success rate of tracheal intubation between stylet and bougie with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope: a randomised controlled trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김현주-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-14T02:44:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-14T02:44:10Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.issn0003-2409-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/199713-
dc.description.abstractHyperangulated videolaryngoscopes are known to increase the success rate of tracheal intubation in the setting of difficult airway management when used with a stylet or bougie. However, there is controversy over which adjunct is more useful. This randomised study aimed to compare first attempt tracheal intubation success rate between a stylet and bougie when using a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope. We recruited patients aged > 20 years who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia and required tracheal intubation. We only included patients with factors predicting difficult tracheal intubation based on pre‐anaesthesia airway evaluation. Tracheal intubation was attempted using a Glidescope® with either a stylet or bougie as an adjunct according to group assignment. Primary outcome was the success rate of the first tracheal intubation attempt, and secondary outcomes were success of second and third attempts; tracheal intubation time; and occurrence of sore throat, dysphagia or hoarseness. A total of 166 patients were included. The success rate of the first tracheal intubation attempt was significantly higher in patients allocated to the bougie group compared with those allocated to the stylet group (81/83 (98%) vs. 73/83 (88%), respectively; p = 0.032). The number of patients who needed two attempts was significantly lower in those allocated to the bougie group compared with those allocated to the stylet group (1/83 (1%) vs. 9/83 (11%), respectively; p = 0.018). Each group had one patient (1%) where tracheal intubation was achieved after a third attempt. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of sore throat, dysphagia and hoarseness between the two groups. When difficult tracheal intubation is anticipated and a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope is used, the success rate of the first attempt is higher when a bougie is used compared with a stylet.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.relation.isPartOfANAESTHESIA-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAnesthesia, General / methods-
dc.subject.MESHEquipment Design-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHoarseness / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIntubation, Intratracheal* / instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHIntubation, Intratracheal* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHLaryngoscopes*-
dc.subject.MESHLaryngoscopy* / instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHLaryngoscopy* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPharyngitis / epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHPharyngitis / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHVideo Recording-
dc.titleComparison of the success rate of tracheal intubation between stylet and bougie with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope: a randomised controlled trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorD Eum-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY J Ji-
dc.contributor.googleauthorH J Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anae.16202-
dc.contributor.localIdA01135-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00128-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2044-
dc.identifier.pmid38114306-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16202-
dc.subject.keywordFrova-
dc.subject.keywordGlideScope-
dc.subject.keywordbougie-
dc.subject.keywordstylet-
dc.subject.keywordvideolaryngoscope-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Hyun Joo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김현주-
dc.citation.volume79-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage603-
dc.citation.endPage610-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANAESTHESIA, Vol.79(6) : 603-610, 2024-06-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.