0 33

Cited 0 times in

Spare the Bowel, Don't Spoil the Target: Optimal Margin Assessment for Online Cone Beam Adaptive Radiation Therapy (OnC-ART) of the Cervix

DC Field Value Language
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-30T07:11:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-30T07:11:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.issn1879-8500-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/199624-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer involves pelvic chemoradiation. Intensity modulated radiation therapy planning requires expansion of the cervix and uterus clinical target volume (CTV) by 1.5 to 2 cm to account for motion. With online cone beam adaptive radiation therapy (OnC-ART), interfractional movement is accounted for, which can potentially lead to smaller CTV to planned target volume (PTV) margins. In this study, we attempted to determine the optimal CTV-to-PTV margin for adequate coverage with OnC-ART and factors that can affect CTV coverage.Methods and Materials: A retrospective cohort of 21 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation was included. Nine patients treated with nonadaptive radiation had the uterocervix contoured on pretreatment cone beam computed tomog-raphy (CBCT) and end-treatment CBCTs. Anterior-posterior, lateral, and superior-inferior shifts and the average shift in all directions were calculated. A CTV-to-PTV expansion was determined and verified on a validation cohort of 12 patients treated with OnC-ART.Results: The average anterior-posterior, lateral, and superior-inferior shifts with standard deviation were 0.32 +/- 1.55 cm, 0.12 +/- 2.31 cm, and 1.67 +/- 3.41 cm, respectively. A uniform 5-mm expansion around the pretreatment CTV covered 98.85% +/- 1.23% of the end-treatment CTV. This 5-mm expansion was applied to our validation cohort treated with OnC-ART, and 98.39% +/- 3.0% of the end-treatment CTV was covered. Time between CBCTs >30 minutes and change in bladder volume were significantly correlated to CTV coverage.Conclusions: Based on our analysis, a CTV-to-PTV margin of 5 mm is adequate to encompass 98% of the CTV. A significantly reduced mar-gin could potentially decrease the toxicities associated with radiation for patients with cervical cancer and lead to improved patient reported toxic-ity outcomes. We recommend physicians begin with a 5-mm margin and assess adequate coverage with image guidance during daily adaptation.(c) 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfPRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHCervix Uteri-
dc.subject.MESHCone-Beam Computed Tomography / methods-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHRadiotherapy Dosage-
dc.subject.MESHRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / methods-
dc.subject.MESHRadiotherapy, Image-Guided* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHRectum-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHUrinary Bladder-
dc.subject.MESHUterine Cervical Neoplasms* / radiotherapy-
dc.titleSpare the Bowel, Don't Spoil the Target: Optimal Margin Assessment for Online Cone Beam Adaptive Radiation Therapy (OnC-ART) of the Cervix-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAllen Yen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByongsu Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEnobang Inam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAustin Yeh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMu-Han Lin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChunjoo Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBrian Hrycushko-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChika Nwachukwu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKevin Albuquerque-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prro.2022.10.009-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ04363-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-8519-
dc.identifier.pmid36356834-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850022003319-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPageE176-
dc.citation.endPageE183-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, Vol.13(2) : E176-E183, 2023-03-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.