0 267

Cited 0 times in

Cited 21 times in

Spare the Bowel, Don't Spoil the Target: Optimal Margin Assessment for Online Cone Beam Adaptive Radiation Therapy (OnC-ART) of the Cervix

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYen, Allen-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Byongsu-
dc.contributor.authorInam, Enobang-
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Austin-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Mu -Han-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chunjoo-
dc.contributor.authorHrycushko, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorNwachukwu, Chika-
dc.contributor.authorAlbuquerque, Kevin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-30T07:11:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-30T07:11:30Z-
dc.date.created2024-04-15-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.issn1879-8500-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/199624-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer involves pelvic chemoradiation. Intensity modulated radiation therapy planning requires expansion of the cervix and uterus clinical target volume (CTV) by 1.5 to 2 cm to account for motion. With online cone beam adaptive radiation therapy (OnC-ART), interfractional movement is accounted for, which can potentially lead to smaller CTV to planned target volume (PTV) margins. In this study, we attempted to determine the optimal CTV-to-PTV margin for adequate coverage with OnC-ART and factors that can affect CTV coverage.Methods and Materials: A retrospective cohort of 21 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation was included. Nine patients treated with nonadaptive radiation had the uterocervix contoured on pretreatment cone beam computed tomog-raphy (CBCT) and end-treatment CBCTs. Anterior-posterior, lateral, and superior-inferior shifts and the average shift in all directions were calculated. A CTV-to-PTV expansion was determined and verified on a validation cohort of 12 patients treated with OnC-ART.Results: The average anterior-posterior, lateral, and superior-inferior shifts with standard deviation were 0.32 +/- 1.55 cm, 0.12 +/- 2.31 cm, and 1.67 +/- 3.41 cm, respectively. A uniform 5-mm expansion around the pretreatment CTV covered 98.85% +/- 1.23% of the end-treatment CTV. This 5-mm expansion was applied to our validation cohort treated with OnC-ART, and 98.39% +/- 3.0% of the end-treatment CTV was covered. Time between CBCTs >30 minutes and change in bladder volume were significantly correlated to CTV coverage.Conclusions: Based on our analysis, a CTV-to-PTV margin of 5 mm is adequate to encompass 98% of the CTV. A significantly reduced mar-gin could potentially decrease the toxicities associated with radiation for patients with cervical cancer and lead to improved patient reported toxic-ity outcomes. We recommend physicians begin with a 5-mm margin and assess adequate coverage with image guidance during daily adaptation.(c) 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfPRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY-
dc.relation.isPartOfPRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleSpare the Bowel, Don't Spoil the Target: Optimal Margin Assessment for Online Cone Beam Adaptive Radiation Therapy (OnC-ART) of the Cervix-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYen, Allen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChoi, Byongsu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorInam, Enobang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeh, Austin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLin, Mu -Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Chunjoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHrycushko, Brian-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNwachukwu, Chika-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAlbuquerque, Kevin-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prro.2022.10.009-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ04363-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-8519-
dc.identifier.pmid36356834-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Byongsu-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85143582800-
dc.identifier.wosid000953058200001-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPageE176-
dc.citation.endPageE183-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, Vol.13(2) : E176-E183, 2023-03-
dc.identifier.rimsid82956-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDEFINITIVE TREATMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRADIOTHERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCANCER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMOTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVOLUME-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTUMOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUANTIFICATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBRACHYTHERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTRATEGIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryOncology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaOncology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaRadiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging-
Appears in Collections:
7. Others (기타) > Others (기타) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.