0 56

Cited 0 times in

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Open Conversion During Minimally Invasive Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study on 3880 Procedures Comparing the Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author최기홍-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-30T06:55:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-30T06:55:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-
dc.identifier.issn1068-9265-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/199448-
dc.description.abstractIntroductionDespite the advances in minimally invasive (MI) liver surgery, most major hepatectomies (MHs) continue to be performed by open surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and outcomes of open conversion during MI MH, including the impact of the type of approach (laparoscopic vs. robotic) on the occurrence and outcomes of conversions.MethodsData on 3880 MI conventional and technical (right anterior and posterior sectionectomies) MHs were retrospectively collected. Risk factors and perioperative outcomes of open conversion were analyzed. Multivariate analysis, propensity score matching, and inverse probability treatment weighting analysis were performed to control for confounding factors.ResultsOverall, 3211 laparoscopic MHs (LMHs) and 669 robotic MHs (RMHs) were included, of which 399 (10.28%) had an open conversion. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that male sex, laparoscopic approach, cirrhosis, previous abdominal surgery, concomitant other surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 3/4, larger tumor size, conventional MH, and Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification III procedures were associated with an increased risk of conversion. After matching, patients requiring open conversion had poorer outcomes compared with non-converted cases, as evidenced by the increased operation time, blood transfusion rate, blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative morbidity/major morbidity and 30/90-day mortality. Although RMH showed a decreased risk of conversion compared with LMH, converted RMH showed increased blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative major morbidity and 30/90-day mortality compared with converted LMH.ConclusionsMultiple risk factors are associated with conversion. Converted cases, especially those due to intraoperative bleeding, have unfavorable outcomes. Robotic assistance seemed to increase the feasibility of the MI approach, but converted robotic procedures showed inferior outcomes compared with converted laparoscopic procedures.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.isPartOfANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHHepatectomy / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHHepatectomy / methods-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications / epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Complications / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHRobotic Surgical Procedures* / methods-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleRisk Factors and Outcomes of Open Conversion During Minimally Invasive Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study on 3880 Procedures Comparing the Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRoberto Montalti-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMariano Cesare Giglio-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAndrew G R Wu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFederica Cipriani-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMizelle D'Silva-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAmal Suhool-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPhan Phuoc Nghia-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYutaro Kato-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChetana Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPaulo Herman-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFabricio Ferreira Coelho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoritz Schmelzle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJohann Pratschke-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDavit L Aghayan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorQiu Liu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMarco V Marino-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAndrea Belli-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAdrian K H Chiow-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIswanto Sucandy-
dc.contributor.googleauthorArpad Ivanecz-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFabrizio Di Benedetto-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hoon Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Hoon Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJames O Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMikel Prieto-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoelimar Guzman-
dc.contributor.googleauthorConstantino Fondevila-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMikhail Efanov-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFernando Rotellar-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGi-Hong Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRicardo Robles-Campos-
dc.contributor.googleauthorXiaoying Wang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRobert P Sutcliffe-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung Ngai Tang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCharing C Chong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMathieu D'Hondt-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBernardo Dalla Valle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAndrea Ruzzenente-
dc.contributor.googleauthorT Peter Kingham-
dc.contributor.googleauthorOlivier Scatton-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRong Liu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAlejandro Mejia-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKohei Mishima-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGo Wakabayashi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSantiago Lopez-Ben-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFranco Pascual-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDaniel Cherqui-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFabio Forchino-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAlessandro Ferrero-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiuseppe Maria Ettorre-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGiovanni Battista Levi Sandri-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAtsushi Sugioka-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBjørn Edwin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTan-To Cheung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTran Cong Duy Long-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMohammad Abu Hilal-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLuca Aldrighetti-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDavid Fuks-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHo-Seong Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRoberto I Troisi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBrian K P Goh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorInternational Robotic and Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group Investigators-
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-023-13525-0-
dc.contributor.localIdA04046-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00179-
dc.identifier.eissn1534-4681-
dc.identifier.pmid37202573-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-023-13525-0-
dc.subject.keywordDifficulty score-
dc.subject.keywordLaparoscopic-
dc.subject.keywordLiver surgery-
dc.subject.keywordMajor hepatectomy-
dc.subject.keywordMinimally invasive hepatectomy-
dc.subject.keywordOpen conversion-
dc.subject.keywordRobotic-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Gi Hong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최기홍-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number8-
dc.citation.startPage4783-
dc.citation.endPage4796-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.30(8) : 4783-4796, 2023-08-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.