44 79

Cited 0 times in

Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Total Intravenous Anesthesia between Remimazolam and Propofol for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김명화-
dc.contributor.author송영-
dc.contributor.author이지원-
dc.contributor.author한동우-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-18T08:16:12Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-18T08:16:12Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/198881-
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the overall postoperative recovery of patients who underwent total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam or propofol, using the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15). Seventy-two patients who underwent spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) were randomly categorized into the remimazolam group (group R) or propofol group (group P). On the first postoperative day, the QoR-15 scores for groups P and R were 114 and 112, respectively, indicating no significant difference (p = 0.691). Similarly, group–time interaction effects on QoR-15 scores were not significantly different. In the post-anesthesia care unit, the pain intensity at rest was notably higher in group P than in group R (3.0 [0.0] vs. 2.8 [0.5], respectively, p = 0.009). Although the intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was higher in group R (1452.4 µg vs. 2066.8 µg, respectively, p < 0.001), the intraoperative use of vasopressors was lower in group R (1705.6 µg vs. 286.1 µg, respectively, p < 0.001) compared to group P. Group R exhibited significantly lower variability in mean blood pressure over time compared to group P. Remimazolam was viewed as a promising intravenous agent for general anesthesia, showing potential to replace propofol in spine surgery with IONM, considering both recovery quality and intraoperative hemodynamic stability.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleQuality of Postoperative Recovery in Total Intravenous Anesthesia between Remimazolam and Propofol for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJiwon Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthor,Dong Woo Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Song-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJongyun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoyoung Jeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyoung Hwa Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jpm14040382-
dc.contributor.localIdA00429-
dc.contributor.localIdA02036-
dc.contributor.localIdA06070-
dc.contributor.localIdA04274-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ04078-
dc.identifier.eissn2075-4426-
dc.subject.keywordintraoperative neurophysiological monitoring-
dc.subject.keywordpropofol-
dc.subject.keywordquality of recovery-
dc.subject.keywordremimazolam-
dc.subject.keywordtotal intravenous anesthesia-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myoung Hwa-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김명화-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor송영-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이지원-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한동우-
dc.citation.volume14-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage382-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, Vol.14(4) : 382, 2024-04-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.