45 89

Cited 0 times in

Effectiveness of low-intensity atorvastatin 5 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg combination therapy compared with moderate-intensity atorvastatin 10 mg monotherapy: A randomized, double-blinded, multi-center, phase III study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김철식-
dc.contributor.author이상학-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-22T05:53:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-22T05:53:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/198276-
dc.description.abstractBackground: We compared the efficacy and safety of low-intensity atorvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy with moderate-intensity atorvastatin monotherapy in patients requiring cholesterol-lowering therapy. Methods: At 19 centers in Korea, 290 patients were randomized to 4 groups: atorvastatin 5 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg (A5E), ezetimibe 10 mg (E), atorvastatin 5 mg (A5), and atorvastatin 10 mg (A10). Clinical and laboratory examinations were performed at baseline, and at 4-week and 8-week follow-ups. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels at the 8-week follow-up. Secondary endpoints included percentage changes from baseline in additional lipid parameters. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among the study groups. At the 8-week follow-up, percentage changes in LDL cholesterol levels were significantly greater in the A5E group (49.2%) than in the E (18.7%), A5 (27.9%), and A10 (36.4%) groups. Similar findings were observed regarding the percentage changes in total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels. Triglyceride levels were also significantly decreased in the A5E group than in the E group, whereas high-density lipoprotein levels substantially increased in the A5E group than in the E group. In patients with low- and intermediate-cardiovascular risk, 93.3% achieved the target LDL cholesterol levels in the A5E group, 40.0% in the E group, 66.7% in the A5 group, and 92.9% in the A10 group. In addition, 31.4% of patients in the A5E group, 8.1% in E, 9.7% in A5, and 7.3% in the A10 group reached the target levels of both LDL cholesterol < 70 mg/dL and reduction of LDL ≥ 50% from baseline. Conclusions: The addition of ezetimibe to low-intensity atorvastatin had a greater effect on lowering LDL cholesterol than moderate-intensity atorvastatin alone, offering an effective treatment option for cholesterol management, especially in patients with low and intermediate risks. © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relation.isPartOfMEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAnticholesteremic Agents* / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHAtorvastatin / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHAzetidines* / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCholesterol-
dc.subject.MESHCholesterol, LDL-
dc.subject.MESHDouble-Blind Method-
dc.subject.MESHDrug Therapy, Combination-
dc.subject.MESHEzetimibe / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHHeptanoic Acids* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors* / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHHypercholesterolemia* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHPyrroles / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleEffectiveness of low-intensity atorvastatin 5 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg combination therapy compared with moderate-intensity atorvastatin 10 mg monotherapy: A randomized, double-blinded, multi-center, phase III study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung-Ah Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoon Jun Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Hoon Sung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung-Soo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong Hwan Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Man Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Wan Chun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Rok Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChul Sik Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae Nyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDae Hyeok Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHwan-Cheol Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Jin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun-Sook Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi-Yong Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Joon Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoong Wha Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong Bo Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Hak Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCheol Whan Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000036122-
dc.contributor.localIdA01054-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02214-
dc.identifier.eissn1536-5964-
dc.identifier.pmid38013289-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Chul Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김철식-
dc.citation.volume102-
dc.citation.number47-
dc.citation.startPagee36122-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMEDICINE, Vol.102(47) : e36122, 2023-11-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.