67 140

Cited 0 times in

Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김덕기-
dc.contributor.author김명수-
dc.contributor.author이재근-
dc.contributor.author주동진-
dc.contributor.author임승혁-
dc.contributor.author강민유-
dc.contributor.author고화희-
dc.contributor.author최문채-
dc.contributor.author민은기-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-03T00:54:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-03T00:54:22Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-
dc.identifier.issn1743-9191-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197405-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The benefits of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (who have high waitlist mortality) are unclear. Regional availability of deceased-donor organs must be considered when evaluating LDLT benefits. The authors aimed to compare the survival benefit of intended-LDLT to awaiting deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in a region with severe organ shortage. Materials and methods: This retrospective review included 649 patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 placed on the liver transplantation waitlist. They were divided into intended-LDLT ( n =205) or waiting-DDLT ( n =444) groups based on living-donor eligibility and compared for patient survival from the time of waitlisting. Post-transplantation outcomes of transplant recipients and living donors were analyzed. Results: Intended-LDLT patients had higher 1-year survival than waiting-DDLT patients (53.7 vs. 28.8%, P <0.001). LDLT was independently associated with lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; P <0.001]. During follow-up, 25 patients were de-listed, 120 underwent LDLT, 170 underwent DDLT, and 334 remained on the waitlist. Among patients undergoing transplantation, the risk of post-transplantation mortality was similar for LDLT and DDLT after adjusting for pretransplantation MELD score (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.73-4.75; P =0.193), despite increased surgical complications after LDLT (33.1 vs. 19.4%, P =0.013). There was no mortality among living-donors, but 4.2% experienced complications of grade 3 or higher. Conclusions: Compared to awaiting DDLT, LDLT offers survival benefits for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30, while maintaining acceptable donor outcomes. LDLT is a feasible treatment for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in regions with severe organ shortages.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.isPartOfINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHEnd Stage Liver Disease* / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHEnd Stage Liver Disease* / surgery-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Transplantation* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHLiving Donors-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSeverity of Illness Index-
dc.subject.MESHTissue and Organ Procurement*-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleSurvival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Hyuk Yim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDeok Gie Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMinyu Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHwa Hee Koh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMun Chae Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Ki Min-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Geun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyoung Soo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Jin Joo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/js9.0000000000000634-
dc.contributor.localIdA05303-
dc.contributor.localIdA00424-
dc.contributor.localIdA03068-
dc.contributor.localIdA03948-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01162-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-9159-
dc.identifier.pmid37565633-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Deok Gie-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김덕기-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김명수-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이재근-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor주동진-
dc.citation.volume109-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage3459-
dc.citation.endPage3466-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Vol.109(11) : 3459-3466, 2023-11-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.