0 79

Cited 5 times in

Response-Guided Therapy With Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, or Ciprofloxacin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Randomized Trial: A Validation Study of 2021 AASLD Practice Guidance for SBP

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박준용-
dc.contributor.author한광협-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-03T00:12:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-03T00:12:17Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197186-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: For the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin were used as first-line agents. However, considering the increasing rate of antibiotic resistance, it is unclear which of these drugs can be initially recommended. This study aimed to compare the current efficacy of the 3 antibiotics, namely cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin, for the treatment of SBP in patients with cirrhosis with ascites, when guided by therapeutic responses. Methods: This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. The inclusion criteria were 16- to 75-year-old patients with liver cirrhosis with ascites, having polymorphonuclear cell count of >250/mm 3 . We performed a follow-up paracentesis at 48 hours to decide continuing or changing the assigned antibiotics and then assessed the resolution rates at 120 and 168 hours of treatment. Results: A total of 261 patients with cirrhosis who developed SBP were enrolled. Most of the patients were diagnosed as those with SBP within 48 hours of admission. The resolution rates at 120 hours, which is the primary endpoint, were 67.8%, 77.0%, and 73.6% in the cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin groups, respectively ( P = 0.388), by intension-to-treat analysis. The 1-month mortality was similar among the groups ( P = 0.770). The model for end-stage liver disease score and the SBP resolution were significant factors for survival. Conclusion: The efficacy of empirical antibiotics, such as cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin, against SBP was not significantly different. In addition, these antibiotics administered based on response-guided therapy were still efficacious as initial treatment for SBP, especially in those with community-acquired infections.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherNature Pub. Group-
dc.relation.isPartOfAMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAdolescent-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAnti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHAscites / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHBacterial Infections* / complications-
dc.subject.MESHBacterial Infections* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHBacterial Infections* / microbiology-
dc.subject.MESHCefotaxime / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCeftriaxone / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCiprofloxacin / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHEnd Stage Liver Disease* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Cirrhosis / therapy-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPeritonitis* / diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHPeritonitis* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHPeritonitis* / etiology-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSeverity of Illness Index-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleResponse-Guided Therapy With Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, or Ciprofloxacin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Randomized Trial: A Validation Study of 2021 AASLD Practice Guidance for SBP-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyung Joon Yim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae Hyung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Jun Suh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSun Young Yim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Kul Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeon Seok Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong Hee Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon Young Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoon Koo Baik-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong Soo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Seok Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoo Young Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Ik Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun Yong Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong Heo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo Hyun Sohn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNae-Yun Heo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwang-Hyub Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSoon Ho Um-
dc.identifier.doi10.14309/ajg.0000000000002126-
dc.contributor.localIdA01675-
dc.contributor.localIdA04268-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00081-
dc.identifier.eissn1572-0241-
dc.identifier.pmid36594820-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.lww.com/ajg/fulltext/2023/04000/response_guided_therapy_with_cefotaxime,.20-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Jun Yong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박준용-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한광협-
dc.citation.volume118-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage654-
dc.citation.endPage663-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, Vol.118(4) : 654-663, 2023-04-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.